It kind of looks like Judy was trying to edit you. Is that coming from
her business of editing or coming from her personal dislike of you? It's
hard to tell with her- is she posing as an editor or is she posing as a
friend? Go figure.
On 10/29/2013 1:34 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Judy, imitating me! The highest form of flattery (-:
---In [email protected], <[email protected]>
wrote:
*Share, your opinion of my opinions about you are wrong, but you are
entitled to them anyway.*
*
*
*Share wrote: *
> Judy, your opinions about me are wrong and you are entitled to them
anyway.
With reference to my earlier post, this response from Share falls
under the heading of "whether it even makes any sense to go there in
the first place." Of course she isn't going to agree with my opinions
of her, and of course I'm entitled to them anyway. Was anyone in any
doubt about this, or was it an utterly useless remark on her part?
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:42 AM, "authfriend@..."
<authfriend@...> wrote:
*/SMASH. /Didn't signal the turn, didn't pay any attention to oncoming
traffic.*
*
*
Share, the bottom line is that you don't take the opportunity to
learn. You knock over all the orange cones and pretend they were never
there in the first place, all the while mouthing empty platitudes that
you think are deep insights.
Share wrote:
Bottom line, traffic jams or not, it's all grist for the mill.
Meaning, it's all an opportunity for learning.
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:57 AM, "authfriend@..."
<authfriend@...> wrote:
*Actually it makes traffic jams /more/ likely because of the much
greater number of accidents when folks rolling in different directions
smash into each other. It's especially problematic when some people
aren't paying any attention to where they're going and don't think
through how they're going to get there, or whether it even makes any
sense to go there in the first place.*
*
Share wrote:*
> Doc, that's what I love about FFL, so many people rolling all
different ways. Less chance of traffic jams that
> way!
