Naah, couldn't be!
 

 (snicker) 
 
Share nitwitted:
 > Mike, somehow, in the total context of your post, snickering does not sound 
 > one iota as 
 > nasty as it does in the total context of Judy's post. Maybe I'm prejudiced.
 

 
 
 On Friday, November 1, 2013 7:47 PM, Mike Dixon <mdixon.6569@...> wrote:
 
   Sorry Share, I don't mean to get involved in your and Judy's feud but I sure 
am snickering with Judy on that one.

 

 
From: "sharelong60@..." <sharelong60@...>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 5:36 PM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Austerity for Americans begins today

   I would bet that not one person on FFL is snickering at Bhairitu. But admit 
that I'm still amazed at how much nastiness Judy can pack into one short post.
   

 ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote:
  
 Er, Bhairitu...
 

 No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: 
 

 Bhairitu bumbled:

 
 > Judy, the conspiracy theorist. On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... 
 > mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

   Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract 
attention from the food stamp cuts. 
 




















 
 
 
 



Reply via email to