Share, Can you write..."I am angry and I don't like Ann and Judy and Emily." Primal emotions Share - do you have the ability to claim those even?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: Emily, imo this is a drop in the ocean of nastiness that Ann and Judy and you create on an ongoing basis against me. Your being self righteous now does not change my opinion. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:20 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote: Read the words you wrote to Ann, Share. Seriously, pretend I wrote them when you do that. How do they make you feel? For one, her *face* Share? My god, Share. Give up on self-help and pray to God for forgiveness. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: Right, Emily, Ann's snarky post was just one of many perspectives. As is my post about her photo. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:58 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote: Good on ya Share. I take full and complete responsibility for what I said and why I said it. Again, check your choice of words. Why would you use the words "ridicule" and "duplicity" - they are a mirror of your own characteristics, imho. Remember the "h" Share and finally, what about "public forum" do you not understand. That's one thing I enjoy - multiple perspectives. If you want to have a private talk with Richard, email him privately. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very cowardly to me. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> wrote: I know. Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top. Maybe she's jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute picture. Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women. Too bad; it must be her "karma" that she was born one to give her the opportunity to learn how to love herself (Hmmmmm....yet another perspective. ha.) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote: In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything Ann has ever said to her. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emilymaenot@...> wrote: Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in her inimitably creative style. "Nasty ridiculing?" - Ann doesn't do this. Your writing is a mirror of you. Think about it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my sense of humor is fine. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this other post. Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting "take" on my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote: Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not them. You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to happen. YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them. And, of course, it worked. So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and grudges -- could be appealed to. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her alleged honesty. > > Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the MGC has directed at me over the past year. > > Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I deserved it retroactively! > > This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's so desperate to present herself as. > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, "awoelflebater@..." awoelflebater@... wrote: > > That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness do you think? > > > ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, > authfriend@ wrote: > > > And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been directed her way. > > > Share spewed: > > turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face. > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote: > >  > Hey, I didn't write it. > > http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\ http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm%5C l >
