Like I said, Feste, Judy doesn't take criticism very gracefully. It's
looking like Judy is striking out on all counts today - not one single
person is defending her. If anyone dares to say anything about her, she
bites back. And there is an echo in here.
On 11/29/2013 4:47 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Um, looks a whole lot different from here, Feste. As for the "weird
punctuation," you must not get around the Web a lot; it's pretty much
standard practice these days for bloggers and commenters when they
want to say something emphatically.
Poor Richard has been exceedingly frustrated that he can't get me to
respond to his trolling (but as I keep saying, if you'd like me to
give you a detailed refutation of anything he says about me, just
ask). If Share "stood up to" me, it must have been awfully feebly,
because I didn't notice. Xeno's making a total ass of himself, not for
the first time. And Barry? He's repeatedly shot himself in the foot
trying to "get" me over the past few days. Trouble is, he doesn't have
any ammunition except lies, and for some reason it never dawns on him
that his lies are easily disposed of. I guess you've been reading only
his posts and not my responses.
Want to try again?
Feste fumphs:
Hey auth, what's with the weird punctuation? Doesn't. Make. Any.
Sense. I can only conclude that you have cracked under the recent
pressure. First, Share stands up to you. Then Richard J. Williams
kicks your ass all over the park, without much reply from you, and
then Xeno and Barry put the boot in, just to make sure you don't get
up. Not a good week for you on this board, is it?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:
*Feste, You. Do. Not. Have. A. Clue.*
*Feste the Clueless wrote:*
> What you and authfriend don't like is that Share does not respond to
you in the way you
declare that she
> ought to, and that makes you mad and mean. You think she should say
what you have scripted for
her,
> butof course things don't work that way, and to expect them to is
just another way of trying to control
> another person.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emilymaenot@...> wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
<no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
It's interesting to see the different approaches taken
by the Mean Girls. Authfriend practices a kind of
knee-jerk negativity that produces crude, nasty
attacks. In respect of Share (and Barry), she is All
Nasty, All the Time. It doesn't matter what these two
write; the response is always the same. Any excuse to
belittle, mock, and insult -- that's authfriend's MO.
With Emily, it's a little different at first. It
starts with the pretense that she doesn't understand
or is trying to understand something that Share wrote.
No pretense. I *am* trying to understand by asking
her to explain what she is saying or thinking or
feeling when she says it. Sometimes I am asking her
to provide a larger context for her comments because a
lot of what she says doesn't make sense to me. I've
stated that many, many, times. Objectively, human
behavior does interest me, no doubt, and I truly am a
sincerely curious sort of person.
Emily likes to sound reasonable and sincere, carefully
trying to disguise her hostility.
I am *sounding* that way because I always give
everyone the benefit of the doubt and I am often
reasonable and usually sincere, albeit, sometimes
within a context or a writing style that you don't
seem to pick up on, given this statement of yours. I
am not a hostile person and I don't hold onto or
maintain hostility on this forum towards anyone ever,
really. If I did, I wouldn't stay here. I have
certain triggers - Share's mean streak is one of them,
when it pops up. I respond to what shows up in the
moment, or as a result of watching the trajectory of a
conversation unfold. I try to keep a larger picture
in mind almost always, even as I may descend into the
energy and feeling of a thread as it resonates within
me. I may not always succeed in the heat of the moment
(in keeping the larger picture at the forefront), but
behind the scenes, in my own life, I always go through
a process of "lessons learned," if you will. I am a
human being and I *believe* in the concepts of
accountability and humility, for example.
This prepares the ground. It's a set up. Then when
Share responds, Emily declares the response to be
inadequate or shocking, and proceeds to plunge the
knife in and twist it as much as she can.
Jesus Christ Feste, I have been shocked by Share on
many occasions, it's true, and she has deferred and
refused to take accountability for her words, or even
explain them, on even more occasions. I have also
apologized more times and copped to my own actions
more than many here and I have stated many times that
I always check what I might say to others against my
self - I am not a saint nor do I pretend to be. Share
has a record of "zero" on that front. I hold no
animosity towards her; I am just objectively stating
what I have noticed from her posts here. To attribute
these kinds of violent images to me says a lot about
you, not me. Curiously, Share, do you agree with what
Feste says here about me? Is this how you have
experienced me on this forum?
