There IS an echo in here - I thought so.
But, did anyone notice how Judy skirted the issue of the name-calling in
order to win the political debate? Now that's some real obsfucation!
P.S. I stand corrected on the Vaj attribution, but the actual poster,
Pedro, was my own debating opponent on alt.a.m.t, so that makes it all
the more interesting. LoL!
On 11/30/2013 8:02 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
(But HINT: Read the exchange on alt.m.t at the URL. **Oh, and "Pedro"
was not Vaj; he was a crazy fundamentalist Christian who infested
alt.m.t for a while. Nor have I ever denied I'm a partisan liberal
Democrat.)*
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote:
There is one thing you will never see from Judy - she will absolutely
never admit that she was in error or that she is a partisan politico.
She's been doing this for fifteen years on internet discussion groups.
In one hilarious exchange, years ago on Usenet, I posted a link to a
Gallup Poll showing the Bush job approval rating. After Judy disputed
my statement, I went back three times to check the results of the
poll. In desperation, Judy's last statement was something to the
effect that I was was a "molusk" for posting a link to a poll that
proved the opposite of what I was saying. Go figure.
At that point, I realized that this lady was so invested in winning a
debate that she would stoop to outright slander in order win a debate.
Never mind the facts of the poll, I'm just pointing out the typical
style of argument Judy uses to demean her debating opponent. What's
interesting about this exchange is that Pedro (Vaj) saw right through
Judy's posing as a political pundit and even posted a note that proved
Judy's overt partisanship. LoL!
That's about the time Judy stopped commenting on any of my posts,
except for calling me a "troll" and a "liar", and became an ECHO,
trying to get everyone else to shun me - because I had dared to
dispute her political view. Go figure.
Look, I'm not stupid and I can read the newspaper and I'll always
admit when I'm dead wrong about the political facts. The actual
graphic is no longer online, but you can get the jist of the
conversation below.
Judy's last resort when she is losing a debate is to post an echo and
ad hominem. In this case, I became a "molusk" and "slime" in a
political debate. Now that's classy!
From the Usenet archives:
From: Judy Stein
Subject: Re: OT: Bush Approval 49%
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2004-06-16 12:46:42 PST
http://tinyurl.com/oruvtdq
I take it back, a mollusk is smarter than he is. What's the next
step down the evolutionary ladder from a mollusk? No, make it
three or four steps down. Not quite to slime mold, but close.
From: Judy Stein
Subject: Re: OT: Bush Approval 49%
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: 2004-06-16 20:28:53 PST
http://tinyurl.com/oruvtdq
I'm wrong again, he *has* made it to slime mold.
