You don't understand. It's called the barbell strategy. You create a system which has some positives and drawbacks. You again create another reverse mirror image system. The two systems balance each other out.
A 'socialistic political system' will balance out a 'capitalistic economic system'. Political subsidies for political parties will ease the pressure off the parties and prevent them from playing to the gallery. They will stop worrying about funds and start focussing on real policies for growth. It also prevents crony capitalism and promotes real pro-market capitalism. --- <s3raphita@...> wrote: > > Re "At least, 3% of the total budget should be allocated to political parties as subsidies.": > > > WTF! I don't want one cent of my money to go to a political party. Let them pay for their own propaganda. > Extremist parties wouldn't arise if mainstream parties actually pursued policies that were in the interests of the voters. How hard can it be? > > > > > --- <s3raphita@> wrote: > > > > > > Re "Capitalist governments shouldn't be bailing anybody out . . . If > > > the government takes the risk out of the equation by offering a bailout, > > > any fool could run a business and risk everyone's investments in it with > > > no lessons learned.:" > > > > > > > > > > > > Precisely my point. You can argue that we should move towards a more > > > Ayn Rand set-up and get governments off our backs. It's states offering > > > bailouts that has encouraged the banks to take idiotic risks. > > > > > > > > > You could argue the opposite though - financial institutions should > > > come under more strenuous oversight from financial regulators with the > > > state limiting bonuses and having a veto on risky investments. > > > > > > > > > It's the current mixed-economy model that isn't fit for purpose. > > > "Bankers socialism" pisses off everyone. > > > > > > > > --- "Jason" <jedi_spock@...> wrote: > > > > The 'capitalistic political system' is the greatest dogma of > > the 20th century. > > > > The 'socialistic economic system' is the second greatest > > dogma of the 20th century. > > > > A 'capitalistic political system' is tantamount to > > 'corporate dictatorship'. > > > > Atleast, 3% percent of the total budget money should be > > allocated to political parties as political subsidies. > > These political subsidies should be distributed to parties > > on vote proportion basis. This will force political parties > > to take a more centrist position and prevent extreme fringe > > ideologies from arising. > >
