---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote:
Let me rephrase that:
NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're posting
here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you have any clients
and almost NOBODY cares if you post anything or not. Almost NOBODY.
Can I just say this: NOBODY cares what you wore today. NOBODY cares what your
face looked like today. NOBODY cares where you drove by during your mundane
day, NOBODY. Oh, except Sweet Share.
Perhaps Richard cares. But then you might be right. What are we? Suppose that
in reality we are all NOBODY inside, that our personal life is but the stuff
dreams are made of, a fiction created by mistaking our idea of ourselves for
something that is real?
Dear Xeno, this is as real as it gets. You need to take the bull by its
proverbial horns and go for a RIDE man. Stop pussyfooting around and pretending
it is all make-believe, that life is a row, row, row your boat. You are in the
middle of something big and something powerful and yet you stand by the wayside
and think it all has nothing to do with you, that there isn't real red
pulsating blood in them thar veins. But there is and you can pretend all you
like that concrete isn't hard and rain isn't wet but you're missing the chance
to ride in the last car of the roller coaster when you live in your head like
you do. I'd love to spend a day with you, but bring your galoshes and thermos
of hot chocolate.
On 12/9/2013 1:23 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>
> Let's make this real simple so everyone understands:
>
> NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if you're
> posting here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if you have
> any clients and NOBODY cares if you post anything or not. NOBODY.
I dunno, Richard. I, for one, would love to see her come up with this
"detailed refuation" she's been crowing about for so long.
So, speaking in my capacity as "someone other than Xeno who takes Richard
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation," I want one.
Failure to produce one will prove Judy a liar, because she made that very
offer just below.
I expect exact quotes, URLs, and citations. Maybe even a bibliography and
footnotes. :-)
> On 12/9/2013 12:51 PM, authfriend@... wrote:
> >
> > This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except
> > Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation,
> > let me know.
> >
> >
> > Richard wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe Share is waiting to see if you'll explain NOT saying the bijas
> > are the nicknames of the deities and why you're mixing working and
> > posting to a discussion group at the same time.
> >
> > On 12/9/2013 11:08 AM, authfriend@ > >
> >> So you've made up your mind to die with the sin of bearing false
> >> witness (one of the Big Ten) on your soul? In your mind, that's
> >> preferable to confessing?
> >>
> >>
> >> (And as you know, "sub specie aeternitatis" has nothing to do with
> >> scolding, so that's yet more false witness.)
> >>
> >>
> >> Share did her phony innocent lightheartedness act:
> >>
> >> >But Richard, you gotta give Judy points, or something, for scolding
> >> me in Latin!Google is my new best friend, along with eternity (-:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Monday, December 9, 2013 8:56 AM, Richard J. Williams
> >> punditster@ > >> This message has all the earmarks of you sitting at your
> >> computer in
> >> a home office posting replies whenever the "ding" goes off, alerting
> >> you that someone posted to FFL.
> >>
> >> So, which is it? Did you say the TM mantras are NOT the names of the
> >> personal gods; or did you NOT say the bijas weren't "nicknames" of
> >> the deities? Go figure.
> >>
> >> "Richard is lying. I never said anything about "the technique,"
> >> whatever it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas weren't "nicknames"
> >> of the deities (whatever "nicknames" means in this context)."
> >>
> >> From: authfriend
> >> Subject: OMG: madhuauudana & definition of dhaaraNaa
> >> Forum: Yahoo! FairfiedLife
> >> Date: November 25, 2013 2:04 PM
> >>
> >> On 12/9/2013 8:36 AM, authfriend@ > >>
> >>> This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
> >>> Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Richard trolled:
> >>>
> >>> > Maybe Share is waiting for you to admit you told a fib about the
> >>> TM mantras being the names of the Hindu personal gods.
> >>>
> >>> On 12/9/2013 8:03 AM, authfriend@ > >>>
> >>>> Do you think this "last resolve" for you, Share, will include
> >>>> confessing and repenting of the falsehoods you've told on FFL? Or
> >>>> are you just going to pretend they don't count, pretend they're
> >>>> only a matter of seeing things differently, and take a chance
> >>>> you'll get away with them sub specie aeternitatis?
> >>>>
> >>>> Share exclaimed:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Wow, Buck, what a great rousing hymn to begin the week with, thanks
> >>>> > for posting.
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
