Just a follow up. So, since this declaration would not mean anything to you, I assume you are raising the issue for the benefit of others?
And yet as soon as the declaration was made, you would declare it as being invalid on account that it is referring to an entirely subjective, unverifiable state of awareness? To me, there seems something out of kilter with this picture. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > Now, wait. This sort of sounds like a set up. I say this because you have > always been a proponent of the "these (supposed) states of consciousness are > all subjective and can't be proven". So, why would such a declaration be > important to you? It wouldn't be the least bit important to me. But you'd think it might be important to Maharishi (who sold this supposed state of consciousness for close to 50 years) to be able to point to even one of his students who embodied it. After all, if he didn't, people might begin to think that the sales pitch was a pile of crap.
