--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I didn't get that Lawson was comparing specific
> > > > > > > characteristics, just noting that many people of
> > > > > > > Jesus' time didn't approve of his behavior--
> > > > > > > socializing with prostitutes and tax collectors
> > > > > > > and such, healing on the Sabbath, etc.  Different
> > > > > > > expectations, but the same tendency to be
> > > > > > > disapproving if they weren't fulfilled.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, because he was doing what he knew to be right, not 
> > > > > > conforming to someone else's standards. Bevan?
> > > > > 
> > > > > This brings up an interesting question -- can one be 
> > > > > enlightened and at the same time be a total toady?
> > > > 
> > > > Define "total toady."
> > > 
> > > Main Entry: toady 
> > > Pronunciation: 'tO-dE
> > > Function: noun
> > > Inflected Form(s): plural toad·ies
> > > Etymology: by shortening & alteration from toadeater
> > > : one who flatters in the hope of gaining favors
> > > synonym : SYCOPHANT -- a servile self-seeking flatterer
> > > synonym : PARASITE -- one who clings to a person of 
> > > wealth, power, or influence or is useless to society
> > > 
> > > That, only totally.  :-)
> > 
> > So you're suggesting Bevan is insincere in his
> > apparent devotion to MMY?
> 
> I merely asked a theoretical question about the
> nature of enlightenment and whether it was con-
> sistent with toadyhood.  
> 
> It seems to me that enlightenment (which I think
> all of us agree is pretty much a useless term, 
> but one we're stuck with) would be pretty wasted
> on a person who drew his or her primary sense of 
> identity from the person of power, wealth or 
> influence he or she had attached himself to.  My 
> feeling is that, because the universe is infinite, 
> someone *could* possibly go that route, but it 
> would be a lot like Sir Laurence Olivier becoming 
> a fawning member of Ralph Macchio's "entourage" 
> so that he could hang around with him all the time.  :-)
>

So Bhakti is impossible for someone who is not enlightened (at least 
to CC), according to MMY, and is impossible for someone who is, 
according to you.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to