Mike, I'm tellin' ya the details. The news programs didn't get the whole story, about the rate going way down the following week.
It was 10 homicides in 36 hours. That's a lot; of course it was on the news. Homicides are around 3 percent of the total number of violent crimes (homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault)--IOW, many fewer homicides than any other type of violent crime, which are typically in the hundreds in D.C. (Or were then--probably fewer now simply because of the across-the-board drop in the crime rate in this country over the last decade.) If there were nonlethal shootings as well, they didn't change the significant decrease in the rate of aggravated assault. Remember that the statistics were from official, public FBI figures. The TMers didn't make 'em up. Read the study and the rebuttal essay for yourself. Judy, I don't remember the details but that it was a national concern at the time on all the national news programs. It sure seems that there were more than just ten homicides. Might have been ten homicides and ten or twenty non lethal shootings in addition. On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 5:10 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: This is a bit misleading, Mike. Rates of aggravated assault and rape decreased significantly from what would have been expected over the period of the study. Robberies stayed about the same. And the homicide rate (around 10 per week) over the eight weeks of the study was also about the same as "normal." There was a "spike" of 10 homicides over one 36-hour period (there apparently was some sort of gang battle), but the following week there were only 4 homicides. So it evened out statistically. You just happened to be there the week of the "spike." I think "shootings" would be included in the "aggravated assault" category; that rate declined significantly over the course of the study. One would, of course, have hoped that the homicide rate would have decreased, but no joy. OTOH, the homicide rate didn't increase, contrary to what some reporters claimed. Here's the text of the study as published in Social Indicators Research:: http://www.istpp.org/crime_prevention/ http://www.istpp.org/crime_prevention/ Here's an article by one of the study's authors rebutting a very sloppy article attempting to debunk the study in Skeptical Inquirer: http://istpp.org/crime_prevention/voodoo_rebuttal.html http://istpp.org/crime_prevention/voodoo_rebuttal.html It addresses the 36-hour homicide spike in some detail. I took my *flying* block in DC during the big campaign there. There was a huge spike in murders and shootings at the time. I guess the TM explanation was, *well you should have seen what it would have been like had we not been there.* On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 1:27 AM, nablusoss1008 <[email protected]> wrote: Along with the mounting medical evidence of the various health benefits of meditation, research shows group meditation can actually reduce crime rates in the greater population. http://guardianlv.com/2014/04/research-shows-group-meditation-can-reduce-crime-rates/ http://guardianlv.com/2014/04/research-shows-group-meditation-can-reduce-crime-rates/
