Why thank you Judy.  Yes, many of Share's posts do give me a measure of 
happiness.  The one below I thought was right on target.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 Speaking of it not taking much to make you happy... 

 Watching you pander to Share is almost as stupefying as watching her pander to 
Richard or Barry.
 

 

 

 I'm not sure that Richard is so concerned about being taken seriously a lot of 
the time. Sometimes, but not as often as some other people who want to be taken 
seriously ALL the time. Go figure! 

 That's excellent Share!  Once again, you've uncovered the subtle truth about 
things.
 

 I also have grown to enjoy Richard's posts.  
 

 On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 2:00 PM, salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> 
wrote:
 
   

You don't have to defend him Share, he can do that if he likes. If he wants to 
carry on and be ignored by 99% of the people here that's up to him. What he 
gets out of it is beyond me.  

 Look at it as helping him realise that he needs to modify his approach if he 
wants to be taken seriously. But like most people here he's old enough to have 
decided the sort of face he wants to present to the world. Go figure.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 salyavin, I think Judy and turq also repeat themselves. True, not as much as 
Richard does. But I think he has redeeming qualities too, as do they. I guess 
it's just a matter of the fact that we all get triggered by different stuff.

 

 On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 12:59 PM, salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> 
wrote:
 
   

Assuming you aren't joking: It's not about length of time spent posting, it's 
about the Chinese water torture of Tricky dicky's endless repetition. Yes, I 
should ignore it but I can't help getting sucked in. Won't happen again.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 salyavin, usually I find you pretty fair minded in your posts. But not so much 
this time. What about the at least 2 other people who have been posting for 
decades? They get a pass from you about that? Only Richard is guilty?!
 

 On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 12:42 PM, salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> 
wrote:
 
   

 LOL, I don't know, I just get sucked in against all my better judgement. Maybe 
deep down I think he'll listen.... but after all these years maybe not. As he 
himself says, thoughts can't affect his mind...

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 Why the hell do you bother, Salyavin? 

 

 

 I was actually hoping you'd come out and say that you'd never got anything 
from meditating and was asking a genuine question. Or maybe you just did that? 

 Anyways, that'd be funny if you'd been doing it wrong your whole life and 
never gotten anything - explain a lot too. But I guess you actually do know 
that some words - or the way they are used - hold wonders for the human mind, 
but instead you just want to "dance" about it and ask obtuse questions like I'd 
want to go along and argue the toss about nothing.
 

 But you've managed to waste another 5 minutes of my one and only precious life 
so I guess that's your mission accomplished. Trolls, go figure....
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote :

 On 4/9/2014 11:36 AM, salyavin808 wrote:

 What's the point of you? What do you get out of this, I can think of a 
trillion things I'd rather be doing than talking crap on an internet forum. I 
just don't get why anyone would bother, and for decades. >
 Why don't you just STFU? If you don't want to dance, why did you come to the 
dance party? Go figure.









 


 














 


 















 


 



















Reply via email to