On 4/12/2014 5:11 PM, [email protected] wrote:
I seriously doubt anyone here defends sati, on any grounds.
You know, Michael, it seems as if your fantasies of some terrible
breach of human decency, as here, are as real to you as an actual breach.
>
He never passes up a tragedy if he thinks that will help him win a
religious debate. It's all about winning, even if he has to resort to
outright prejudice.
I am sure Buck and that idiot Nabby will find something satvic in it
and defend it as part of the ancient code of male dominated idiocy
that still rules the land of the veda that gave birth to such huckster
fraud con artists as Marshy, Sai Baba, Muktananda and Amma. Go figger.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
