Yep, that Dr. Hagelin did not wear the gold foil hat and robe is extremely 
interesting for TM-watchers. Also of note, some of the other TM-Raja who did 
not but who were there in the crowd is noteworthy also as for who did not go 
for the hazing of the meeting at this point. What was MAR thinking and those 
other few guys doing that? It is a small group inside TM really. Our Mayor of 
Vedic City coming in along with this entourage and sitting too in front of the 
group looking like a news-reel incarnation of a white suited bloated Field 
Marshal was a little haunting of something too. He and the Raja of the Raj were 
the only ones now dressed in that white-creme suit special look. Overall it was 
a good meeting with the meditating community but evidently it was not exactly 
your normal meditator knowledge meeting. You had to be there to see it,
 -Buck
 

 
 sparaig writes: The Rajas are people who paid $1 million to become the 
administrators of the TM organization at the highest level, or who managed to 
get someone to pay that money for them. 

 As I understand it, a requirement to be a raja was not simply that you pay the 
money but that you be willing to wear the funny hat.
 

 Apparently that hat requirement has ben relaxed at least somewhat, but since 
Tony abu Nader gets to rewrite the rules as he sees fit, that isn't all that a 
big deal if he choses not to wear his crown in public appearances.
 

 The fact that John Hagelin didn't wear HIS crown as Raja of North America is 
more interesting, but again, Tony Nader gets to write the rules and it if is OK 
with him...
 

 Of course, John Hagelin might be an exception to the rule in several ways as 
he can wear any of 4 hats (that I am aware of): Raja John Hagelin: 
Professor/Director John Hagelin; President of the David Lynch Foundation, John 
Hagelin; Chairman of the board of directors of the Maharishi Foundation, John 
Hagelin.
 

 The other guys seem happy or at least comfortable with wearing their hats in 
public, but then again, most of them don't make many public appearances outside 
TM organization functions while King Tony and Raja John are very much in the 
public eye by comparison.
 

 

 L
 

 Share writes:
 “The Rajas are just a weird offshoot of a main organization”.
 

 So why the gold foil hats and robes, now?   What were they thinking the other 
night coming, sitting and leaving in their processional in and out of the 
meeting in full WTF-regalia?  Generally groups can both live and die by their 
own specialness. The social-science field of altruistic evolution proly has a 
lot to say about that. This TM group has been killing itself off over the long 
years by cultivating extra-specialness within it. And, this cultivating 
specialness of the Rajas now? Does a larger meditating community want to belong 
to that or have that represent it? It all seems more like a hazing than 
anything else. It was interesting to see who [which Raja] were not wearing the 
gold crown and robe git-up at the meeting. That itself proly took some courage 
to do.

 
 -Buck
 

 Yes, the Raja part of TM is such a small circle in TM and of the larger TM 
community but people do wonder if they are going to keep doing it. When you 
talk to meditators in the community there is a general disheartenment that 
those guys wear that stuff representing the movement and the meditating 
community here. Generally you ask people here if they are meditators and the 
meditators respond saying, “yes, but not that.. .”, pointing in the general 
direction of campus and Vedic City.
     
 

 7Ray27 writes:
 Hey Michael,
 

 Most of what I know about the school comes from the annual publication I get 
listing achievements and donors about and to MUM..  (and yes, I am listed as 
making a small donation)
 

 But as I understand it Craig Pearson is the administrative head of the school. 
 

 Now, whether he takes his orders from the Rajas, or Bevan, or if is able to 
work independently, I don't know.
 

 I do happen to know someone higher up in the school administration and talk to 
him very infrequently.  But the impression I get is that those administrators 
handle to day to day running, without a lot of direct oversight or interference 
from the rajas.
 

 Of course, in the same publication, they also list the trustees of the 
university.  They are many, and very few (if any) are  rajas, IIRC.
 

 So, that may offer a different perspective than the one you are offering.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :

 an offshoot? What are you smoking? Let's see - the leader of the Movement, 
King-Pin Tony CALLS himself not only a king but the BIG king, he wears robes 
and a big ass gold crown - all the other leaders including Bevan are all robe 
and crown wearers - these asses RUN the Movement - if the rajas aren't in 
charge who is? The fact that you can't accept these guys have become the face 
of the new Movement is indicative of just how deep your denial runs.
 

 

 sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@...> wrote:
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Student Housing and More I think
 it's called the World Wide Web.  
 The
 Rajas are just a weird offshoot of the main organization.
  I'm not sure what direct connection the Rajas have
 to academic life.
 As
 for due diligence during the time you were involved in the
 organization and people looking at it now, it's sort of
 like indicting the Collective Papers for being so low on
 Amazon's Book list compared to the guy's book that
 just came out about the murder of his fellow MUM student. A
 lot has changed in thirty years.
 The
 world just doesn't turn exactly the way you want it to
 Michael.  You have to get used to that fact.
  Despite your earnest efforts to defeat the
 organization in every way you can, you may end up being
 frustrated.  
 But
 I'm sure you'll stay at it.  It appears to be
 quite a preoccupation for you.
 And
 really, if truth be told, it seems to have come on heels of
 your other failed spiritual ventures.  Perhaps all that
 frustration got all balled up, and this is now the
 result.
 Just
 sayin' 
 mjackson74
 wrote :
 
 You must be
 living with your head in the sand Share - the TMO masks a
 great deal of what it does from the outside observer
 including those who are prospective students. I have told
 the story of how I just a few months ago had a good talk
 with a young man and his mother. The boy was intent on going
 to MUM - they had been to visitors weekend and didn't
 even know anything about the rajas! I had been in the TM
 mindset for 10 years before I went to MIU and I had no idea
 of the stupid crap I would have to put up with while on
 staff - no one does unless they have been on staff or as a
 student. 
 Share Long <sharelong60@...>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Student Housing and More
 
 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com";
 <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 
 Date: Sunday, April 20, 2014, 9:28 PM

 
 
 salyavin, in this day and age, however could a person join
 a
 
 utopian cult without realizing it?! Sounds to me like
 
 someone who didn't do their due diligence.
 
 
 
 And if it's really as bad as the blogger claims,
 
 wouldn't he have noticed the trailer park etc. when he
 
 first arrived. Plenty of time to get money back or not
 
 enroll at all. I doubt that the blog is telling his part in
 
 all this.
 
 
 
 The students at MUM now are very different than the
 students
 
 who were at MIU in 1975. Back then many were TM teachers
 and
 
 or had already been meditating for a few years.
 
 Californians! Nowadays they're into David Lynch or
 
 sustainable living or organic food or some combo or these
 
 (-:
 
 
 
 As for me, I'm no longer on the inside and haven't
 
 been for almost 12 years, 7 of which I didn't even go
 to
 
 the Dome. Plus I have constant contact
 
 with my non meditating family so I'm aware of how it
 
 all looks to non meditators. 
 
 
 
 On Sunday, April 20,
 
 2014 3:37 PM, salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
 
 wrote:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
 <sharelong60@...> wrote :
 
 
 
 Well salyavin, in all my years here,
 
 we've only had one earthquake and it's epicenter
 was
 
 over in Illinois across the Mighty Mississip, a river which
 
 supposedly has a fault line running down it.
 
 
 
 I'll have to ask some
 
 vastu dwellers about the homeowners insurance.
 
 
 
 PS btw, speaking of good
 
 questions, I think mine is a good question too: if this
 
 blogger is so unhappy with MUM, why does he continue being
 a
 
 student there?! 
 
 As I said, he probably
 
 has his money invested in it, be hard to change to another
 
 one without losing any downpayments or even just getting on
 
 another course at this stage without starting
 
 again.
 
 Maybe he's
 
 got a lot of anger at finding out that he joined a
 
 utopianist cult without realising it? I've never been
 to
 
 FF or MUM but I know how the movement works and let's
 
 face it, the TMO is more than a bit weird. You may not
 think
 
 so as you are on the inside but the TM worldview is unusual
 
 and takes some getting used to for anyone. If you
 
 steadfastly refuse to adopt it then you will be unhappy. Is
 
 it possible to just go to MUM and not notice what everyone
 
 else believes? 
 Afterwords, out in the Dome entry area and on the sidewalks to the parking 
areas as the meeting closed and people left: a big WTF reaction was, that they 
actually came wearing the gold foil hats and robes and stuff. I can't say that 
Alex's brother or some of those others following after Maharaja Adhiraj 
Rajaraam also in full regalia did not necessarily look or seem particularly 
ethereal in the cult outfit. Though that might have just been the bad light on 
them. It did sort of look and feel like The Return of the King set for The Lord 
of the Rings.
 It was just a little narcissistic. However, Hagelin and our other movement 
dignitaries seated on stage facing the crowd were dressed secular in suits and 
such. Generally was dignity and was all more corporate than cult. Lots of good 
people with high-mindedness and well-intentioned. Deserves only a watching and 
of course transparency to see. It was a good meeting of the remaining 
meditating community.
 -Buck in the Dome. 
 This is all an interesting consideration about Transcendental Meditation. Very 
much like Brahmananda Saraswati, our Guru Dev, meditators here 
characteristically are very practical, down to earth and real in their 
spirituality. You have read the discourses of Guru Dev, Maharishi's teacher? 
People here are quite experienced spiritually. For instance meditators well 
know that if there is no useful shakti in something presented as spiritual then 
they will mostly go on to the next satsanga. Yes, there is a wide 
disheartenment in the old community of TM teachers and meditators with the 
specialness a Raja stick in TM. Even the TM.org is hiding the gold foil hats 
and robes of the Rajas. What were they thinking coming in to that meeting in 
full regalia? Certainly they considered it. That would have been a good 
question to have asked of Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam [MAR], CEO and Teacher of 
all of TM from the open Microphone at the meeting and heard an explaination of 
their need to wear that stuff in public. Nablusoss, you seem to have been 
around that more than anyone posting here. Maybe you can take a whack at the 
reasoning that they would come to visit America dressed like that. I don't got 
time towards to representing that POV on behalf of them here. Alex is related 
to it, may be he has some insight about the 'why' of gold foil hats. It is a 
question everyone asks about the meeting, “did they wear the hats?”. Notably, 
John Hagelin did not wear that stuff. That proly took some guts.
 -Buck . 








  

Reply via email to