Okay, fine, so now you and Sam Harris are atheistic transcendentalists in 
experience without poetry.  And by your own experience, in shorthand, a 
“substitutor meditator” in spiritual practice, Evidently like Sam Harris. 
Welcome back,
 -Buck
 

 Curtisdeltablues writes:

 

 Buck writes:
 

 Yes, evidently Harris is a transcending meditator even as a Buddhist!  That is 
wonderful.
 -Buck in the Dome
 

 Did you see that even CurtisDeltaBlues is a transcending meditator now that 
way too?
 

 It's all the same Unified Field once you get going.

C: Although Sam Harris practices a form of meditation that came from the 
Buddhist traditions  he does not self identify himself as a Buddhist.

Harris:
"Given the degree to which religion still inspires human conflict, and impedes 
genuine inquiry, I believe that merely being a self-described “Buddhist” is to 
be complicit in the world’s violence and ignorance to an unacceptable degree". 
- See more at: 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf
 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf


Again Harris;

"As students of the Buddha, we should dispense with Buddhism." - See more at: 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/ 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/
 As students of the Buddha, we should dispense with Buddhism. - See more at: 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf
 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf
 As students of the Buddha, we should dispense with Buddhism. - See more at: 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dp 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf

Harris is an enthusiastic supporter of the kill the Buddha if you meet him on 
the road POV. 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf
 
 As students of the Buddha, we should dispense with Buddhism. - See more at: 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf
 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf
 As students of the Buddha, we should dispense with Buddhism. - See more at: 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpuf
 
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/killing-the-buddha/#sthash.Hbqbm55C.dpufI
 think there are some useful distinctions to be made in these experiences. 
Lumping them all together under a banner of physics poetry is unlikely to 
result in our understanding the differences between these experiences, and I 
believe those distinctions could be useful. And not in some triumphalist "one 
is better than another", but perhaps people may need different techniques 
depending on the results they are seeking or even some personal variables that 
we will never understand if we throw them all together. Plus I believe there is 
some brain study research that supports the idea that there really are 
differences between meditations types neurologically.


From my limited experience it already seems that there are major differences 
between the goals of different techniques as well as completely different 
shaping of the interpretation of the experience and its meaning depending on 
the belief support system. This may have an as yet unknown effect on the 
experiences themselves.

I am advocating epistemological humbleness as we try to understand ourselves 
through these different practices without coming to the lab with a set theory 
about what any of this means. That is a huge difference between our approaches 
to meditation practices. I am as skeptical of the Buddhist interpretation of 
meaning as I am the Hindus. I think we can do better with a fresh look outside 
these presumptions.   


 

 B: I was reading a discourse recently by Guru Dev and he was urging people to 
just do it, meditate and it [the transcendence] will become more familiar.  It 
is very beautiful in nature that way.
 -Buck  

C: He might have been more experimental in his personal life but in his role as 
the Hindu Pope he represents the exact opposite of the perspective I am seeking 
on this topic.But perhaps you can refer to me as a 'substituter" rather than a 
"quitter" from now on. I appreciate your open mindedness I really do.

 

 sharelong60 writes:

 
 Richard, sense of self vanishing and having greater well being sounds like 
what happens during TM!

 On Thursday, May 1, 2014 7:10 PM, Richard J. Williams <punditster@...> wrote:
 
   On 5/1/2014 3:26 PM, curtisdeltablues@... wrote:
 > Any tips or insights, especially since you have a TM history and might 
 > know the issues TMers might have would be welcome. 
 >
 According to Harris, by paying close attention to moment-to-moment 
 conscious experience, it is possible to make our sense of "self" vanish 
 and thereby uncover a new state of personal well-being.
 
 'The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason'
 by SamHarris
 W.W. Norton & Company, 2004
 p. 214
 
 --
 


 


 














Reply via email to