This stuff is confusing - I meant that someone who is ignorant [of his basic nature] will continue, by necessity, to reincarnate, after which the ignorance is dispelled, incarnation may possibly continue to be an option. Is that what you meant??
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : I think by "ignorant" he meant not enlightened, not "off the wheel." One of his better bons mots. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fleetwood_macncheese@...> wrote : Makes sense - the process is not uniquely human, just that we can apprehend it, and become aware of it, during our time as humans. So there must come a time when it is no longer *necessary* to continue to come back here, or anywhere else, though quite possibly a choice remains, even then, to take any form at all, anywhere we choose to. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that "Reincarnation is for the ignorant" was the only way he said it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote : I have heard he said it many different ways. (snip) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote : Just to be picky, "I don't believe in it" can mean either "I don't believe it exists" or "I'm opposed to it." If you're opposed to abortion, you might well say, "I don't believe in abortion." Anyway, what I heard that he said was "Reincarnation is for the ignorant," which is better than either.