Dear Friends;  I'd rather be secretary. But were I chairman I'd start with the 
Mission Statement then develop metrics around how we are doing with that which 
everyone can check and see. Establish written job descriptions for everyone and 
job reviews for everyone every quarter. Bring more metric in to jobs and hire 
on merit. Look much more to performance and a lot less to fealty. Have job 
assessments to help people do their jobs better. Raja Hagelin already is 
establishing a flow chart that allows everyone to see where they are at within 
the movement community. I'd keep him around working on that. Make the financial 
books entirely transparent now for everybody to see. Break down so much of the 
culture of specialness within the movement and elevate the practitioner 
meditator in the movement. Bring meditators in to the large group meditations 
of the Domes. Be a lot more magnanimous than the current guy who is unable to 
use the inclusive words “thank you” and “we” with hardly anyone. I am no fan of 
Mao but I do appreciate some of the corporate organizational effort and 
leadership in his quotations for the clarity of relationship he established 
between everyone moving forward as to how they were included and fit in at all 
levels. Effective corporate leadership is also in cheer-leading the mission. 
That clearly has been missing for the several years since Maharishi's passing. 
Were I suddenly to become chairman I should attend to these things. Refer to 
this other post for further feeling as to how things could look under one 
Chairman Buck's leadership:
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/communal-studies-forum/qAs9ROcD8Ro
 
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/communal-studies-forum/qAs9ROcD8Ro
 
 
 Jai Guru Dev, -Buck in the Dome
 

 

 punditster asks:
 

 What if you woke up one morning and you found out that you had been maned 
Chancellor of MUM and Manager of the men's dome?
 

 #
 

 Punditsir writes:
 What if you woke in the morning and you found out that you had been banned 
from meditating the dome and the MUM campus for posting messages to an anti-TM 
discussion group?
 

 Dontknow. Would likely be regrettable. Ironic too. I am one of the only ones 
here on FFL advocating and even defending the Dome meditation program on merit. 
I see that there is a notice in the Dome now just more recently since the TM 
movement old-guard has recently returned to Fairfield of a 'new' badge that 
people need to start updating to. I am good until next year unless they seize 
my Dome badge somehow. I would not even let John Hagelin hold my badge once I 
got it back.
 Jai Guru Dev,
 -Buck in the Dome
 
 
 Yep, thanks for noticing and appreciating this. I have been working at 
developing this Cartesian graphing of mysticism as a thesis for a while as an 
aid in helping those people who are reserved or even flat out skeptical about 
spirituality to be better able to place mysticism and mystics within the 
histories of different spiritual/religious movements. -Buck
 
 
 fleetwood_macncheese writes:
 
 
 "horsing around" - lol
 
 
 Yes, agreed.
 
 
 A very grounded approach to your reading methodology - I really loved reading 
the description, and the way it was so cleanly put together - brilliant, 
really. I am a total engineering freak, with a perennial billboard in my head, 
reading, "How does it work?!" - for anything -- from personal interaction, 
lasers, growth of consciousness, internal combustion engines, tides and surf, 
microwave ovens, music, dog food bag fill machines, all of it.
 
 
 Buck writing:
 
 
 More inclusively, I feel we would be nothing here on FFL without some of the 
lower scaled of illumination by example of some of these writers posting here. 
Theirs is also an important dissonance to the higher plane of spiritual 
discussion that can go on here. I always appreciate reading Turqb and that 
ignorant guy from South Carolina that way too.
 
 
 I find in Parsing the different writers posting on FFL as a practicality 
towards figuring out who to read and what to spend time on reading I tend to 
use the tool of a paired Cartesian graph to place people on and then read 
according to my time and interests as people are placed on the graph.
 
 
 For instance, on the vertical axis I quickly scale a writer based on their 
posting history from a low of aggravated narcissistic disorderliness, to just 
the generally narcissistic, to the middle ground of the ignorant and more 
common psychology of the ordinary waking state, to the spiritually awakened or 
illumined, to the more saintly in capacity of spiritual transformation. That is 
on the vertical axis, low to high.
 
 
 On a horizontal I tend to then use a scale of relative altruistic communalism 
of someone[someone's use of or participation in groups] from zero or 
individualistic to large organizational participation. That sets people 
relatively nicely apart in a useful way as to where they are coming from. It 
provides an efficiency to sorting the list. There tend to be some people who I 
read all the time and some who I do not read hardly at all. Parsing using this 
tool becomes fun and useful for sussing writers out and placing them in to 
pigeon hole.
 In Love,
 
 
 -Buck, out Standing in his Field
 
 
 horsing around today.. Buck Brannaman Horse Riding and Training Notes
 
 
 
 
 Buck Brannaman Horse Riding and Training Notes Buck Brannaman Horse Riding and 
Training Clinic Notes. Horse training for western cowboy, dressage, natural 
horsmanship, trail riding.


 
 View on sites.google.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 
 
 Fleetwood Writes:
 
 
 It has been rather fun, over the last couple of days, noticing that Barry 
seized upon my request to go away, and having fun with him, since. 
Unfortunately, at his expense. I say "unfortunately", because Barry does 
something that many with a weak mind, indulge in. 
 
 
 If Barry disagrees with someone, all logic flies out the window, and his 
primary reaction, as someone attached to his actions (aka waking state), is 
emotional. He repeats insults, cherry-picks ways to discredit, and now, as we 
have humorously seen, even falls for my satire. 
 
 
 Nothing in reserve. No data to back up anything, except the same crusty 
anecdotes that he has been trotting out, for the past 20 years. He just barfs 
it all out there, and thinks, "well I bloody well showed them!". As you can 
see, with the emotionally charged, blunderbuss approach, he misses the target, 
more often than not. So, having made himself look the fool, he then keeps 
doubling down, looking more and more ridiculous. 
 
 
 My playful request for him to, "Please, please, pretty please with sugar on 
top, go away", is much more for his benefit, than mine. I'd personally like to 
see him retain a shred of dignity, and take a few months off.
 
 
 Awoelflebater writes:
 
 
 
 The internet and TV are his life, Mac. He has nowhere else to go. Because his 
life is a desert he must try and make sure everyone else suffers along with 
him. Not that what he rants about, whether it be some insanely off-the-mark 
theory about Judy and Robin's private life or your enlightenment, bears any 
resemblance to truth or reality but he likes to believe it does. And it is 
true, he needs to go away simply to save himself from himself but there is no 
shred left of dignity or credibility for him here anyway at this point and 
because he has no other life he will remain until this place is no more. His 
exposure is complete. They is nothing else of bawee to know about. His crude 
and telling remarks about Judy and Robin couldn't possibly have made anyone 
reading them feel anything but embarrassed for bawee. He's pretty much a freak 
show.














 
 


 
  




 
 

      • Re: [F... TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... nablusoss1008
      • [Fairf... nablusoss1008
      • [Fairf... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
  • Re: [FairfieldL... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
    • Re: [Fairf... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • [Fairf... dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
      • Re: [F... Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Reply via email to