Who's telling you all this nonsense ? There were hundreds iof western ladies
attending the funeral including many from Fairfield and MD,---In
[email protected], <LEnglish5@...> wrote : rajas as rajas are male.
My recollection is that Maharishi's funeral was officially an all-male event,
so it's not surprising that there were no obvious females in attendance,
whether in the company of rajas, or standing by themselves.
L
---In [email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In
[email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In
[email protected], <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote : Yeah, the girl/woman
thing within the TM movement is its own story. Someone should be collecting
interviews from some of the women still alive who have lived and been
influential at the apex regions of the TM movement. Get their stories and
perspective on how as modern women they survived at that level. For instance
the mom of Keith and Peter Wallace lived close inside it for decades at the
top. Bevan's mom too. I think both are gone now. There are a few elders from
who it would be really good to hear their stories and observations about being
a woman inside and surviving at that level with access and some influence. I
can think of a few but won't give their names out here. However, some
thoughtful scholarship different than ranting could certainly come along there.
Yes, knowledge is good, dear Bucky, but when you see a whole shwack of men in
golden crowns and flowing robes attending MMY's funeral with nary a female in
sight then you gotta questions whether their busy at home preparing the
chapatis and scrubbing the laundry on river rocks.
Let's try this again without the typos: take out the 's' in question and write
"they're" instead of their. Geez, you'd think I was milking the goats the day
we learned this in school.
-Buck
Dear Dear FFL; Maharishi did not designate a 'Guru' to follow him; however,
the Raja are like the equivalent of executive vice presidents in our modern day
corporate order. And, like executive vice-presidents in any large corporations
or like Lieutenant-Generals in large armies or revolutionary movements, some
simply are more effective than others; there are Rajas and there are Rajas.
Some are there because they are effective executives of the corporate mission
and some are there because of their money and their willing essential capital
support that they can altruistically give to the execution of the mission of
the corporation. This was all very well planned out ahead of time by
Maharishi. Get over it. It was well prepared for. They were given the
authority and responsibility for the TM movement the way it is today. They
certainly are learning as they go along what they in fact have inherited from
Maharishi. You will notice that they rarely wear their outfits in public now.
They are learning. I wish them all well and great success. A lot is riding on
them.
Jai Guru Dev,
-Buck in the Dome
Thanks for this explanation of the role of the Rajas. So they are more like a
board of directors of a company it sounds like. This is interesting. Just
because these MEN have assets does this mean they have any expertise in running
a company? Or a Movement? What are these MEN'S backgrounds? Can you provide a
list of who they are and how long they remain or have remained "on the board"?
You need at least a million in gifts to the Movement to qualify? How often do
they get together? Now I am interested in this group of MEN who, apparently,
due to their financial status and willingness to give to the Movement have been
asked to wear robes and crowns. Tell me more.
alexander_stanley@...> wrote : When the whole raja thing came about, people
came up to me on more than one occasion and asked what it was like to be the
brother of a raja. My reply was that it's exactly like not being the brother of
a raja, except now people come up to me and ask what it's like to be the
brother of a raja. I was tempted to have a t-shirt printed with, "My brother
became a raja, and all I got was this lousy t-shirt."
I am sure you have taken some indirect, and perhaps direct, flak about this
Raja business. And because I like you (even though I don't really know you) I
always am aware that when I make a comment about Rajas that your brother is one
and it makes me feel just a teeny bit guilty. However, the Raja concept is one
I have a hard time wrapping my proverbial head around because:
A) Their wardrobe is preposterous
B) There don't appear to be any female Rajas (maybe they declined the option,
seeing as the wardrobe is not good).
C) The idea of this hierarchical monarchy business just seems so strange and
elitist and transparent since it's based on monetary contributions.
D) I'm jealous and really want to wear a white robe emblazoned with gold
embroidery.
awoelflebater@...> wrote :
mjackson74@...> wrote :
Has your bro ever let you try on the crown and does it appear to be made of
tin or gold?
See, this is why I love you MJ.
From: "j_alexander_stanley@... [FairfieldLife]"
<[email protected]>To: [email protected] Sent: Friday,
August 15, 2014 7:30 PMSubject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Relating to spiritual
teachers (was Re: 8/12&13/14-Maharishi...)
When the whole raja thing came about, people came up to me on more than one
occasion and asked what it was like to be the brother of a raja. My reply was
that it's exactly like not being the brother of a raja, except now people come
up to me and ask what it's like to be the brother of a raja. I was tempted to
have a t-shirt printed with, "My brother became a raja, and all I got was this
lousy t-shirt."
---In [email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In
[email protected], <mjackson74@...> wrote : How you know? Have you
bitten one to check and see if its gold?Gold or tin, they'll both bend between
a set of teeth. The higher the gold content, the softer it is. I'm thinking
these guys actually wanted to be Pope but had to settle for Raja instead.
