--- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Akasha, go back to your quasi-Nazi control-the-crime-rate through > > > > abortion theories... > > > > > > First and second law of rhetoric. > > > > > > If you can't discuss an issue intelligently, > > > > > > 1) make huge leaps of non-logic about the other person's position. > > > > > > 2) call the other side a Nazi. > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. > > > > So you can make comments about my nationality but when I call your on > > your genetic theories, you cite the above. > > I did not make any disparaging remarks about canadians.
Bullshit. You know and I know and everyone that read it knew that you cited Canadians -- and not Armenians or Germans or Peruvians or any of the other 150 or so nationalities of the world -- because that is MY nationality. You made it personal, Bub. At least have the integrity to be honest. And you chose genitals to make your point -- not arms or legs or other appendages or organs -- because that is where your mind is. And you used a derogative term for male genitals -- dick -- because, again, that is where your mind is at. > I was just > trying to create a selective enough example so you might think about > what it means for the state to control a body, male or female. Jeez > you read a lot of vindictiveness into things. > > Per "established FFL rules" ( :) talk to patrick Gilliam) calling the > other side a nazi, means you lose the argument. > > And your sense of equivalancy???? !!!!: "So you can make comments > about my nationality but when I call your on your genetic theories, > you cite the above." I make no disparaging remark about canadians so > that gives you the right to call people nazi's and make up supposed > theories that they have???? !!!!! > > I simply cited a study. It was not pro or anti abortion. It indicated > the relationship between crime and abortion. That makes me a Nazi? It does in the same sense that my copying and pasting the article on Nobel prizes makes ME supportive of the opinions expressed in THAT article. I imposed the same standard you imposed upon me upon you. >Is > Levitt a Nazi? (thats a jewish name isn't it?) I don't know. Unlike you, I don't judge people by their name and the apparent genetic/racial/religious heritage it may suggest but by the content of their character. > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
