On 9/9/2014 9:35 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
As mentioned by the US generals, the US cannot win the war against
ISIS by air power alone. It still needs military boots on the ground
to drive away the militants from Iraq. The military boots should not
be coming from American soldiers. The military boots should be from
the Iraqi forces. It is their country and they should be defending it.
>
The Iraqi army cannot defeat ISIS in Syria, without U.S. air power,
that's my point. Only the U.S. has the stockpile of arms to continue the
strikes against ISIS. There is nobody willing to put boots down on the
ground in Iraq in order to defeat ISIS except the Kurds.
The problem is when ISIS goes for Pakistan, a nuclear state, and then
threatens India with a nuclear strike.
>
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote :
On 9/9/2014 11:11 AM, Bhairitu noozguru@... <mailto:noozguru@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
The US funded the Mujahideen to fight against the Russians in
Afghanistan. Why? Because greedy US businessmen wanted their
hands on the recently revealed to the public rich resources in
the Afghanistan (which was why Russians were there in the first
place). Then the Mujahideen because Al-Qaeda and a new boogeyman
to get the American people in a "war mood" and support spending
heavily on defense which of course profited the military
industrial complex. Then the US supported ISIS to help overthrow
the Syrian government. Now they are the new boogeyman to drum up
more defense spending. Best way to defeat ISIS was to not
support them in the first place.
>
The past is already gone, you need to face the present. The best
way to defeat ISIS is to vote for the political candidate that
will be willing to fund the U.S. military. The the only way to
defeat ISIS is with U.S. military air power. That's what President
Obama is already doing. Without U.S. military air support, the
European and Middle Eastern governments will NOT be able to defeat
ISIS. It's not complicated.
>
On 09/08/2014 07:34 PM, jr_esq@... <mailto:jr_esq@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
It's the formation of a new government in Iraq, according to
Kerry. IMO, this indeed is the most reasonable of all
approaches, along with the necessary support from world
governments to defeat ISIS.
https://news.yahoo.com/kerry-heads-mideast-talks-islamic-state-180834352.html
