Do you expect, really to get an answer from Edg on this inconsistency? Edg is cowardly in that way. Doesn't like to answer when caught in a contradiction, or obvious falsehood.
---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : If you are speaking for yourself, why did you use the pronoun "we" instead of "I"? I disagree with you about training. I think the TM teachers were well trained and did a good job. For myself, I knew enough to teach the technique and explain it in a coherent way. I taught TM to several hundred people and never felt underprepared, although I am not going to play your game of defining terms. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : I am speaking for myself, but of course? You? Of course, you're speaking for yourself too. No choice in this, eh? Meanwhile, you've ignored my main gripe -- that we were not trained well -- not even well enough to define our basic axiomatic words. If you think you got more outta Maharishi's teachings, let's see ya define those words for all of us. I will be over here breathing......not holding my breath that is.
