---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :
Over the time I have been reading your posts here it sounds like you are one of the few you know who have made yourself independent of the TMO and still meditate - aren't there any other former TM'ers you know or like you they do TM but don't do the Movement? My sister still meditates but that's it. And she was a TM teacher since 1970, taught at MIU and has initiated lots of people. She has no interest or use for the Movement but has been meditating for 46 years. From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 4:51 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Established in Being, let anger take over ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote : I wish to God you would write a book about your time in the UK Movement. It would be funny, but only a snapshot of what went on over the years though I do know some great stories. Be good to interview everyone else for their own experience but I doubt I'd get many takers once they realised I was telling the whole story and not the sanitised stuff they give out to make them seem perpetually successful. I've no doubt some would say I was being negative even! BTW, I just remembered that the Perfect Man course was the second one that they offered on MOU. The first was the Total Knowledge course. That was the one I did, I declined the chance to take the others due to the Total Speculation displayed in the first. From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 4:05 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Established in Being, let anger take over ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jedi_spock@...> wrote : > They also had a Q&A section at the end where they invited people to write in > with questions and comments. I wrote a nice letter asking how the concept of > human physiology being present in vedic literature fitted in with evolution. > Seems to me that if the ved is perfect then it can't have changed over time, > if it didn't change then it wouldn't have fitted our physiology any time > before the last 100,000 years. Could it be that the bald headed coot never heard of a Charlie named Darwin? Funnily enough I was sitting at the dining table one day reading a book about Darwinism, The Scars of Evolution by Elaine Morgan, highly recommended as it will disabuse you of the notion that your body was well designed, or designed at all in fact. Anyway, this TM teacher looked shocked when I told her what it was, she leaned over and quietly informed me that Marshy doesn't believe in Darwinism, I told her that I wasn't asking him to. I remember it well because it was the first of many times that I had someone try and control what I was reading, most Orwellian.
