I have seen a couple posts that alluded to this - but I don't know any details, who is it that actually wrote the commentary and why did he or she do it?
________________________________ From: "Bhairitu [email protected] [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:55 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why MMY's Bhagavad Gita will never be a classic. Except, as we've heard here many a time, it really wasn't his commentary. He just approved but gave no credit to the scholar who wrote it. So it goes in the big business of cults. On 09/17/2014 03:19 PM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife] wrote: >I wasn't there, with Shiva, or Parvati, during that discussion, and I just >wouldn't take an interpretation, on face value, from a third party. I liked >MMY's commentary - but I admit not having read any appreciable amount of it, >in years. Perhaps I will pick it up again. PS Anyone can write a commentary. >Whether or not people consider it authoritative, is a personal matter, and not >given to supposed edicts, from you, or anyone else. > > > >---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : > > >Who is limiting their horizon, here? >For decades I thought Mahesh Yogi's commentary was the be all and end all of >Bhagavad Gita commentaries. >Why? >Because the movement said so. >Ignorance is Bliss. > > >Lord Shiva's discourse to Goddess Parvati..."Sri Guru Gita" explains who is >qualified and who is not. > > >It is clear from this scripture where Mahesh Yogi stood. > >
