Bevan would not be glad to hear you tell such tales.
________________________________ From: netineti108 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:41 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why MMY's Bhagavad Gita will never be a classic. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote : On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:42 PM, netineti108 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > >>So what you insinuate here is that chapters 7-18 are insignificant and not >>worthy of his time. >> >What I am insinuating is that if you don't understand Chapter II verse 45 of >BG, and you don't know TM, and you have not read the MMY's CBG, is that >Chapter 7-18 are insignificant and not worth my time discussing it with you. >> > > >Dear Fellow, After three + decades of the TMO, I knew it too well. > > >I derived great benefit from his CBG in my earlier years. >But it was incomplete and my statement that he was not qualified to comment on >the remaining chapters is evident as Mahesh Yogi was not educated in the >tradition and his actions showed it. > > >If he was a maharishi, why did he have others by his side to interpret >Sanskrit/Veda? >Who was that sweet old Brahmarishi by his side at the Hague in 1985? >Also in Humboldt 1972, there was a Brahmarishi with his son interpreting for >Mahesh Yogi. >He was no maharishi. Again the western culture's ignorance just blindly >accepted this. > >> >> >> >>What is written above is just intellectuallizing and is not a path with >>knowledge to navigate. >> >It's sounds pretty clear to me - go beyond or transcend the three gunas born >of nature. > > >"Oh Arjuna, the Vedic scriptures deal with subjects in the three modes of the >material nature. Become self-realized, transcendent to the three modes in pure >consciousness, free from duality and free from conceptions of acquisition and >preservation." > > >http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Gita/verse-02-44.html >> > >It is nothing new. Maybe to the Western mind, but not to those who are brought >up in the Vedic tradition. >> >Which Mahesh Yogi was not. He was a clerk. >> >He was a yogi clerk - that's how he wrote his commentary. >> > > > > >He said, "I am not a personal guru" yet so many ignorant souls did not know >what Guru is. >> >You are mistaken - he did not say this anywhere in CBG. Speak for yourself. >> > > >I never claimed he said it in CBG. But he did say it. I heard him say it. > > >MMY on the Bhagavad Gita: >CBG: II., v. 45, p. 126 VI., v. 1, p. 384 >> > >
