---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote :
I suspect that your outrage, and that of Dan's is limited to your own sacred cows, and doesn't apply to leaks of other "secret" communications you feel should be revealed. Steve, to answer for myself only, your 'suspicion' is incorrect. Please try again. Just get over it, already. It's nothing! It's not even a tempest in a teapot. Okay, the fact Jerry Jarvis has some involvement, makes it sort of interesting. But still......................let it go. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote : Rick Archer, maybe I missed it but you still just seem to be evading answering the question of how you had the right to violate someone's privacy but publishing this email, what was it about this email that compelled you to take such a step?
