Okay, for example, Carmen Segarra who recorded Fed meetings, in which she felt the Fed was too subservient to the Wall Street Banks in dealing with the financial crises, I suppose you feel those recordings should not have been revealed?
There really were no great revelations in those recordings, but they offered insight into the crisis and how the Fed responded. You have said your son participates in demonstrations in the financial district against the power of big banks and financial institutions. I suppose if he came across a confidential document that shed insight into how these banks operate, you would recommend to him that he not reveal that information. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : ---In [email protected], <steve.sundur@...> wrote : I suspect that your outrage, and that of Dan's is limited to your own sacred cows, and doesn't apply to leaks of other "secret" communications you feel should be revealed. Steve, to answer for myself only, your 'suspicion' is incorrect. Please try again. Just get over it, already. It's nothing! It's not even a tempest in a teapot. Okay, the fact Jerry Jarvis has some involvement, makes it sort of interesting. But still......................let it go. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : Rick Archer, maybe I missed it but you still just seem to be evading answering the question of how you had the right to violate someone's privacy but publishing this email, what was it about this email that compelled you to take such a step?
