--- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/11/05 11:44 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > And in good science this discourse goes back and forth > > with re-analysis of data, arguments for and against > > stated conclusions and out of this seeming mess really > > good, scientific advances come about. (On a side note, > > if you follow the topics in scientific journal > > articles it is amusing how rival "camps" all but call > > each other assholes in their publcations) > > Unfortunately the TMO is not interersted in having its > > ME research looked at because they know it is not > > robust. It's a very faint whisper of pattern in a sea > > of random noise that can only be seen if you look at > > it in a very particular way. > > And yet Hagelin brags repeatedly that the ME is the most verified thing in the history of science. Only one in a gazillion odds that it could be chance. P values to 25 decimal places or some such thing.
Which crappy model spcifications and bad out of whack parameters in other areas can create. See my adjacent post on this. Thats why you need to look at the full range of relevant parameters and makes sure they are witnin acceptable bounds. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
