since he never was courteous to me, as you claimed, and your assertion that I 
was behaving in a "low" manner based on his (nonexistent) courtesy to me, then 
my behavior was not "low" in any respect, so you did not address the scurrilous 
nature of your false allegation towards me, but its not unusual for a TM junkie 
to behave in such a fashion - I mean after all Marshy taught everyone to ignore 
the truth, say whatever you like and then tell everyone to pay no attention to 
what you said before.

So I won't hold it against you - its just the upbringing you had in the Movement



________________________________
 From: "Share Long [email protected] [FairfieldLife]" 
<[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rick: about your rule
 


  
So Michael, does this not count?!

Share to Ann at 7:11 am: Ann, maybe courteous wasn't the best word. I think Dan 
brought a lot of 
fun and intelligence and sometimes gentleness to FFL. And actually I 
thoroughly enjoyed some of jedi's posts too. IMO, it's a loss that 
they're gone.




On Saturday, October 4, 2014 12:03 PM, "Michael Jackson [email protected] 
[FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]> wrote:
 


  
Ohhh, Share thinks I am a mean old man - yet I have not seen you show any 
willingness to take back the false statement you made about me, claiming I made 
a low comment since Danny Boy was so "courteous" to me - a lie which Ann kindly 
exposed. 


But I guess since you have the TM glow around you, your unpleasant behavior is 
just really alright. 


"Any action done by a TM'er cannot by definition be a wrong or objectionable 
action in and of itself since it was performed by a TM'er." - Share's mind set. 



________________________________
 From: "Share Long [email protected] [FairfieldLife]" 
<[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Rick: about your rule
 


  
feste, thank you for saying this about MJ. I agree. I guess the difference is 
that there is no TMO ADL!



On Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:08 AM, feste37 <[email protected]> wrote:
 


  
Booting off jedi for what appears merely to be expressing a view of Judaism 
seems absurd to me. It has often been said that the God of the Old Testament 
is, shall we say, a less than attractive character: jealous, vindictive, 
vengeful, cruel. That's not anti-Semitism. It's mere literary criticism. Yet on 
this board Little Mickey Jackson is allowed to spew forth his hate speech 
against MMY and the TMO every single day, full of crude insults and libelous 
accusations—and that's considered perfectly okay. There are some very curious 
double standards operating here. 



---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote :


On 10/3/2014 11:36 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
>
>Hmmmm,
Rick -- not sure but seems to me there's been plenty of
anti-religion to go around -- not just against the Jews.  If
someone says TM is of the devil etc. with ALL CAPS etc....will you
give equal warnings?
>
>Everyone makes mistakes. It looks like Rick considered Spock's
message as "anti-Semetic", when in fact it was just Spock's
opinion about the Jewish religion. It looks like Rick panicked and
got really scared when Dan threatened to file a report to the ADL,
so Rick deleted Spock's message and put a ban on him posting. 
>
>Now we don't even know what jedi_spock posted because it's been
deleted. This should be notice to you: you could be banned from
FFL for expressing your opinion and all you messages deleted forever.
Go figure.
>
>P.S. When you change the subject title, Edg, you make it difficult
to follow the conversation, and when you fail to click on Show
message history, other informants don't even know what Rick's rule
is about posting messages.
>
>
>






Reply via email to