On 10/4/2014 4:35 PM, Michael Jackson [email protected]
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
I am only "wrong" about TM and suicide and the TMO and suicide in your
mind. In what way did ANYONE negate what I said about the TMO NOT
being inthe forefront of ANY attempts at providing succor for those
suffering in Fairfield?
>
/Non sequitur. It has already been established that you have not been
within 1000 miles of Iowa in decades. Therefore you would have no idea
what the residents of Fairfield are currently attempting in providing
succor for those suffering. It has already been established that Rick
Archer instigated this discussion group in an effort to help people with
suicidal tendencies, case in point./
>
In fact, the lady who gave that very informative post affirmed the
effort in Fairfield was NOT being led by the Movement. You really are
a TM junkie aren't you?
>
/Non sequitur. It has already been established that the practice of "TM"
or "TMSP" has zero effects on suicide rates in Iowa. It has not been
established that the practice of "TM" is addictive. Case in point./
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Share Long [email protected] [FairfieldLife]"
<[email protected]>
*To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Saturday, October 4, 2014 4:42 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Rick: about your rule
Michael, anyone who takes such obvious pleasure in, as you did when
Steve and Dan were arguing, such a person imo, has no credibility when
it comes to saying what is or isn't "WONDERFUL behavior."
Also the fact that though you've been shown, even by an objective
lurker, how wrong you were about TMO and suicide, you have not
recanted your original statement that the TMO ignores it.
Plus the fact that you continue to make such negative allegations
about people and an organization with whom you've had no contact in
decades.
On Saturday, October 4, 2014 3:23 PM, "Michael Jackson
[email protected] [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
And yet Ann busted you when she said that in fact Dan had not been
"courteous" to me at all. You back peddled and said "Oh uh, maybe
courteous wasn't the right choice of words"
But you just can't let go of the idea of me being a low person no
matter what Danny Boy said or did, eh?
Is it part of your TM induced glow in your brain that leads you to
believe that attacking a TM basher is actually a courteous thing and
that's why you are doing it now? Ahh, TMSP leads to such WONDERFUL
behavior.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Share Long [email protected] [FairfieldLife]"
<[email protected]>
*To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Saturday, October 4, 2014 3:13 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Rick: about your rule
Michael, imo Dan was often kind and or courteous to you and also imo
your remark to Rick was low given that he was; also low in that Dan
was no longer here to defend himself.
On Saturday, October 4, 2014 1:56 PM, "Michael Jackson
[email protected] [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
since he never was courteous to me, as you claimed, and your assertion
that I was behaving in a "low" manner based on his (nonexistent)
courtesy to me, then my behavior was not "low" in any respect, so you
did not address the scurrilous nature of your false allegation towards
me, but its not unusual for a TM junkie to behave in such a fashion -
I mean after all Marshy taught everyone to ignore the truth, say
whatever you like and then tell everyone to pay no attention to what
you said before.
So I won't hold it against you - its just the upbringing you had in
the Movement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Share Long [email protected] [FairfieldLife]"
<[email protected]>
*To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Saturday, October 4, 2014 1:33 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Rick: about your rule
So Michael, does this not count?!
Share to Ann at 7:11 am: Ann, maybe courteous wasn't the best word. I
think Dan brought a lot of fun and intelligence and sometimes
gentleness to FFL. And actually I thoroughly enjoyed some of jedi's
posts too. IMO, it's a loss that they're gone.
On Saturday, October 4, 2014 12:03 PM, "Michael Jackson
[email protected] [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Ohhh, Share thinks I am a mean old man - yet I have not seen you show
any willingness to take back the false statement you made about me,
claiming I made a low comment since Danny Boy was so "courteous" to me
- a lie which Ann kindly exposed.
But I guess since you have the TM glow around you, your unpleasant
behavior is just really alright.
"Any action done by a TM'er cannot by definition be a wrong or
objectionable action in and of itself since it was performed by a
TM'er." - Share's mind set.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Share Long [email protected] [FairfieldLife]"
<[email protected]>
*To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:17 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Rick: about your rule
feste, thank you for saying this about MJ. I agree. I guess the
difference is that there is no TMO ADL!
On Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:08 AM, feste37
<[email protected]> wrote:
Booting off jedi for what appears merely to be expressing a view of
Judaism seems absurd to me. It has often been said that the God of the
Old Testament is, shall we say, a less than attractive character:
jealous, vindictive, vengeful, cruel. That's not anti-Semitism. It's
mere literary criticism. Yet on this board Little Mickey Jackson is
allowed to spew forth his hate speech against MMY and the TMO every
single day, full of crude insults and libelous accusations—and that's
considered perfectly okay. There are some very curious double
standards operating here.
---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote :
On 10/3/2014 11:36 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
Hmmmm, Rick -- not sure but seems to me there's been plenty of
anti-religion to go around -- not just against the Jews. If
someone says TM is of the devil etc. with ALL CAPS etc....will
you give equal warnings?
>
Everyone makes mistakes. It looks like Rick considered Spock's
message as /"anti-Semetic"/, when in fact it was just Spock's
opinion about the Jewish religion. It looks like Rick panicked and
got really scared when Dan threatened to file a report to the ADL,
so Rick deleted Spock's message and put a ban on him posting. /
Now we don't even know what jedi_spock posted because it's been
deleted. This should be notice to you: you could be banned from
FFL for expressing your opinion and all you messages deleted
forever. Go figure./
P.S. When you change the subject title, Edg, you make it difficult
to follow the conversation, and when you fail to click on Show
message history, other informants don't even know what Rick's rule
is about posting messages.
