--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Rick Archer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > on 11/13/05 9:57 PM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > Absolutely not. Pure Bliss is not happiness. Happiness > > > is a relative phenomenon. To equate Being with > > > relative happiness is just the terrified mind taking > > > refuge in a concept as Being eats it alive. It keeps a > > > person stuck in ignorance seeking an "experience" of > > > pure consciousness. > > > > Probably most of us remember the lecture in which Maharishi says > that "bliss > > is not blissful," the point being that bliss is a relative quality > and the > > Absolute is quality-less. > > > > Yeah, and while IN the field of bliss there is just being, so how > can there be "bliss" until you come out of it? >
In CC there can be relative degrees of happiness, of course... ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
