--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > on 11/13/05 9:57 PM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > 
> > > Absolutely not. Pure Bliss is not happiness. Happiness
> > > is a relative phenomenon. To equate Being with
> > > relative happiness is just the terrified mind taking
> > > refuge in a concept as Being eats it alive. It keeps a
> > > person stuck in ignorance seeking an "experience" of
> > > pure consciousness.
> > 
> > Probably most of us remember the lecture in which Maharishi says 
> that "bliss
> > is not blissful," the point being that bliss is a relative 
quality 
> and the
> > Absolute is quality-less.
> >
> 
> Yeah, and while IN the field of bliss there is just being, so how 
> can there be "bliss" until you come out of it?
>

In CC there can be relative degrees of happiness, of course...







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to