Funny how Cordozo, er, Curtis, stood up for Barry immediately. "Great minds" think alike, I guess.:-) ---In [email protected], <emily.mae50@...> wrote :
You know, I am willing to grant BW the benefit of the explanatory "context" for the three words that he put together. Curtis has explained this for him in a clear and concise manner; Alex understands this to be the case as well. I am also, interestingly enough, practicing the idea of being "transparent", in the sense of allowing things to pass through one (after all, I do have a teenage daughter who rejects/opposes me right now in everything, no matter how compassionately I try and approach her) to reduce reactivity for one and for two, not lock in and get all obsessive about whatever it is, requiring a bunch of effort to let go at that point. However, I cannot even IMAGINE a conversation where those three words would cross my lips or fingertips ever, for any reason whatsoever. None - for no reason. Horrifying, they are. I would have thought, personally, that BW would have issued an apology for putting those three words on paper and subjecting those who read this forum to them. But no, he doubled down and tripled down and moved into a massive ego-driven response. Uck and more Uck. ---In [email protected], <reverse_archery@...> wrote : You show me "the line" and I will agree with you, Barry Wright. I am raising the possibility of an issue. Are you overreacting again? Yes, we think so. ---In [email protected], <turquoiseb@...> wrote : Point of order, Rick. Recently you FINALLY got rid of Richard Williams, for the crime of using someone's real name on Fairfield Life, while trying to slander them and ruin their reputations in the real world. It seems to me that Jim Flanegin has just stepped over that same line. What are you going to do about it? From: "reverse_archery@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 2:52 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] My concern for Barry being around children - An analysis Barry has been around FFL for many years. He has also freely insulted Maharishi for many years. However, this was always done in terms of Maharishi's supposed dalliances with adult women. Barry had a field day with it, living by himself in France and Spain. However, a couple of years ago, Barry informed us all that he would be moving into a mixed household, including a two year old girl. Keep in mind that the other adults are sexually involved with each other, and also run a business. This leaves "Uncle Barry" ample time for baby sitting. My concern is the "coincidence" of Barry now living with a small child, a girl of three, and suddenly, inexplicably revising his insults of Maharishi, to now include a reference to sex with children; "Maharishi butt-fucking babies". Am I making too much of this? I don't think so. The other thing of great concern, is Barry's reaction to this. Far from being chagrined at this monstrous expression, he has gone on the offensive, pretending to turn in anyone who takes offense, to the police and Interpol. A bit of overreaction, don't you think? As if he has a lot to hide, and protect. Reminded me of Bill Cosby, hiring an army of investigators to dig up dirt and discredit his accusers, those he drugged and raped. I don't make a secret of my dislike of Barry. But I think there may be a more serious issue here, and from the way Barry is acting, it is getting worse, not better.
