You could try pulling off this Quantum Suicide as a hoax. Set up the experiment 
as described and film your self or have witnesses confirm that you've survived 
20 times in a row. You could then claim to have demonstrated the many-worlds 
theory beyond a doubt and win the Nobel Prize for Physics.  

 What you're really done is use a gun with a shaved firing pin.
 

 

 

---In [email protected], <s3raphita@...> wrote :

 Re "How lame would a person have to be to even *think* like that, much less 
commit suicide over it. If this scenario is reasonable to you, could you 
explain it to me?":
 

 Re Niven's story: If all choices are without any ultimate meaning then the 
conclusion follows. If *you* decide to commit suicide, in another parallel 
world *you* don't commit suicide. So whether you commit suicide or not makes 
not the slightest difference in the sum total of reality. Ditto whether you 
become a murderer or a humanitarian, etc, etc. Bit dispiriting, no?
 

 The "Quantum Suicide" scenario is different. Here, the idea is that whether a 
gun fires or not (with 50/50 probability) is linked to a quantum event. As the 
quantum event (say the spin clockwise or anticlockwise of a particle) exists in 
two alternative worlds then your being dead AND alive (the gun fired/did not 
fire) must exist in the same two alternative worlds. In one world you're dead 
so it's lights out. In the other world your life is spared so your 
consciousness continues. But it's your (Barry's) "I" that has split so if you 
play this quantum Russian roulette ten times in a row and you're still alive 
then the many-worlds theory must be true. (The only other option is that by 
some fluke you've evaded odds of 1/210.)
 

 If you want to try this at home and so confirm that the many-worlds theory is 
indeed true then bear in mind that this suicide experiment only works if the 
gun's firing or not is linked to a *quantum* uncertainty. It doesn't work if 
you just roll dice to decide the issue (that's classical physics). Stay safe.
 

 

 

---In [email protected], <richard@...> wrote :

 ---In [email protected], <turquoiseb@...> wrote :
 
 While I'm certain all of this is fascinating to those who are fascinated by 
such things, I find myself reacting similarly to the way I did when you brought 
up the fellow who wanted to spend his last moments before dying rectifying the 
mistakes he'd made in the past. That just does not compute for me.

First, we should probably state that this argument is way beyond our pay grade, 
meaning that most people don't even think about these kinds of subjects. Most 
ordinary people on the street are not philosophers and deep thinkers or 
scientists with authored studies. 

 

 Similarly, the concept of someone becoming so distraught that another version 
of themselves is more successful or having more fun in another universe than 
they are does not compute for me. How lame would a person have to be to even 
*think* like that, much less commit suicide over it. If this scenario is 
reasonable to you, could you explain it to me?

The question is, do we have free will, able to cause change at will, or is 
everything determines, there are causes for everything that happens, karma. 
Obviously, being caused means not being free, whither its on this earthly plane 
or in a parallel universe.

This brings up other questions such as what is determinism, the scientific 
thesis that there are causes for everything that happens, and what is 
free-will, or non-determinism?

According to Sam Harris, "We continually influence, and are influenced by, the 
world around us and the world within us.  It may seem paradoxical to hold 
people responsible for what happens in their corner of the universe, but once 
we break the spell of free will, we can do this precisely to the degree that it 
is useful."

Free Will
by Sam Harris
Free Press
p.63  

 

 From: "s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 3:27 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Ramayan in Human Physiology-with video links
 
 
   Re my post from a while back: "Someone (I forget who) wrote a sci-fi book in 
which the multiworlds quantum theory has been finally proved true and there is 
a mass outbreak of suicides as people realize that elsewhere there are other 
"themselves" who made the right career choice, made the right choice of 
partner, etc, and they can't bear the thought they're stuck in this universe as 
failures.":

 

 I just now came upon the title. It's All the Myriad Ways by Larry Niven.
 

 From Wiki: 
 In the eponymous story contained within, Niven attempted to craft a response 
to stories featuring the many-worlds interpretation as a key plot point, taking 
the social implications of infinite realities to a depressing conclusion. A 
police detective, pondering a rash of unexplained suicides and murder-suicides 
occurring since the discovery of travel to parallel universes, begins to 
realize that if all possible choices that might be made are actually made in 
parallel universes, people will see their freedom of choice as meaningless. The 
choice not to commit suicide, or not to commit a crime, seems meaningless if 
one knows that in some other universe, the choice went the other way. They 
therefore kill themselves or commit the crime, because they abandon the sense 
of choice.

 

 I'm reading a book at the moment called Our Mathematical Universe by Max 
Tegmark (described on the cover as "one of the rock gods of cosmology") which 
argues that the many-worlds theory is our best explanation for our physical 
universe. As a bonus he includes an experiment that could prove the many-worlds 
theory true! It involves playing Russian roulette with a gun that would fire or 
not depending on a 50/50 quantum uncertainty. Here's an explanation of "Quantum 
Suicide" from a web page. It's neat!
 
http://io9.com/5891740/quantum-suicide-how-to-prove-the-multiverse-exists-in-the-most-violent-way-possible
 
http://io9.com/5891740/quantum-suicide-how-to-prove-the-multiverse-exists-in-the-most-violent-way-possible

 

  

 


 













Reply via email to