smart move on your part, Michael. 

 I wouldn't want to be reminded of the fool you make yourself out to be.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :

 Happily I still have Willy Tex and Steve his Clone's emails automatically 
routed to the trash so I never know what they are yapping about till someone 
else comments on it.
 

 From: "TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 10:42 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Well, well, well.
 
 
   
 Michael asked a question, and I did two 10-second Google searches to find the 
answer. That's "obsession?"

 

 It occurs to me that what the two cultists below are *really* upset about is 
that all it took was 20 seconds to prove how full of shit the TM movement is in 
the crafting of its propaganda.  :-)
 

 Or maybe they were both about to lie and claim that the phrase "global repair 
mechanism" was taught to them on their TTC courses and has been used in TM 
literature for ages, and my 20 seconds of Googling made that impossible.  :-)

 

 


 From: feste37 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>

   The level of obsession is indeed remarkable, Seventh. 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote :

 You guys crack me up. 

 I haven't read any of the dozens of pages you've been writing about your 
favorite subject - just noticing that you just endlessly write about it.
 

 Keep it up.  It gives you something to fill your days!
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote :

 It's a newly-invented buzzword, Michael. If you do a Google search for the 
exact phrase "global repair mechanism" plus the exact phrase "transcendental 
meditation," it shows up only on several MUM web pages with recent revision 
dates, and on one Dutch site (nl.tm.org). 
 

 If you go a Google search for *only* "global repair mechanism," you'll 
understand why the TMO decided to rip this phrase off. It appears to be a 
popular new buzzword in the world of science and IT. My suspicion is that some 
dweeb in Vlodrop noticed that it was the new "buzzword du jour" and decided to 
appropriate it for TM propaganda, the same way Maharishi appropriated Hans 
Selye's buzzword "stress" many years earlier. 

 

 From: "Michael Jackson mjackson74@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 2:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Well, well, well.
 
 
   
 One of the things I would ask about my own original post on this is:
 

 Has anyone here ever heard of this business - "As published research has 
indicated, the TM technique triggers a global repair mechanism in the 
physiology and psychology of everyone"
 

 Global repair mechanism? When did the Movement ever or Marshy ever talk about 
something like that? And when was it ever in any research papers the Movement 
loves to blabber about?

 

 


 From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 4:48 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Well, well, well.
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote :

 salyavin, I was about to post a message making pretty much the same points :  

 MMY touted TM as a universal panacea ; That the TMO should release such a 
document now is an encouraging sign of progress ;

 As the TMO moves at a snail's pace we'll probably all be dead by the time it 
develops a sober assessment of TM's (undoubted) strengths and limitations. What 
limitations? Well, I don't rule out the possibility that for some disturbed 
individuals doing TM could actually exacerbate their condition.
 

 It can indeed, and maybe not even in extreme cases. I lived and worked with 
the TMO for ten years and met a lot of people and talked a lot about TM and 
what it does or doesn't do. My overriding impression is that there is sometimes 
a huge disconnect between what people expect TM to do (or claim it has already 
done) and what they have actually achieved using it.
 

 I've met people who would talk endlessly about how spiritual they are and the 
benefits they've gained but when I've got to know them better it's turned out 
that they are seriously damaged and/or unpleasant people to greater or lesser 
degrees. The funny thing is they had no idea, one girl I knew was astonished 
when I told her that she had no self awareness whatsoever, she was amazingly 
unpleasant when you got past her social persona. I wondered what the point of 
devoting your life to meditation is if it can't touch the very things that 
probably drive you to seek it out as a therapy in the first place. But here's 
the thing, they don't know that it hasn't worked, part of the TM teaching is 
elitist in that you are taught from day one that you are a better person for 
being in touch with the "transcendent".
 

 I honestly think that it can make people more eccentric, this can be endearing 
but can result in them just not fitting in with normal society any more. There 
are plenty like this in the long term movement in the UK and all of them are 
really genuine spiritual people but they don't realise that obsession with 
beliefs, routines and ritual has turned them into inflexible maniacs. 
 

 Some of the people I've known have developed mental health problems since 
learning TM which isn't what you'd expect if you listen to the TMO. The claim 
is that releasing stress cures neuroses and makes problems less likely to 
arise. Clearly something wrong there. I know a lot of siddhi practitioners who 
see therapists, it was a standing joke at the academy in fact.
 

 But am I looking on the dark side and seeking out the worst case types to 
bolster my argument? I don't think so, I became aware of what was going on just 
by listening to others and that was only after I got past my own programming 
that everything was fine and I was on the fast track to enlightenment. But I 
have no idea about the actual percentages of TMers who didn't get what they 
expected are.
 

 The trick for any researchers is going to be finding people that learnt TM and 
weren't exposed to the belief system and so aren't full of BS, maybe a search 
for neurotic traits in long term meditators would be be a fun way to start. 
I'll volunteer.
 

 So what will be left if a proper root and branch examination of TM was carried 
out? The Maharishi Effect will be gone by the end of the day obviously. In 
fact, if you look at the TM website it seems to have gone already, the whole 
things looks like a health page from the sort of women's magazine that you see 
in dentist's waiting rooms: 
 

 http://tmhome.com/ http://tmhome.com/
 

 I think the mental health claims will be amended to "Can be effective for some 
people with some conditions but may exacerbate the same thing in others. For 
yet others it works only at first and that's as long as you don't get swept up 
with the hyperbole and keep up another sort of professionally led treatment 
plan if you have a particular condition". Not very catchy but seems to reflect 
the sort of disappointments I've seen, it just doesn't deliver what is promised 
for a lot of people. Or maybe the people I met are so desperate for it to work 
they signed up for endless courses in the hope of forcing a breakthrough? 
 

 One thing is for sure mental problems aren't caused by "stress" trapped in the 
nervous system that could be released by being more relaxed, that's just the 
sort of cultish snake oil that has tripped up the Scientologists too. and the 
TMO's attempts so far are just more vedic nonsense simply because they have no 
other way of looking at the world - it has to have a vedic solution because 
everything is vedic. They will come to see the error of that in the coming 
years if they keep up the inquisitiveness.
 

 If you don't have any actual problems TM may be more effective. I remember a 
Buddhist I knew saying that anyone with problems should get them sorted before 
they learn to meditate. Maybe it will still turn out to be the best thing ever, 
just with a lot more caveats on the website..
 

 I still do it BTW, I just don't tell myself that it's doing anything at all 
and enjoy the experience and I'm not obsessive with it and even [gasp] do other 
techniques. 
 

 

 You've spared FFL from my disjointed thoughts with your admirably lucid 
message. (Are you a writer in some professional capacity?)
 

 Thanks, but no. Most of what I write is "letters to the editor" stuff or sarky 
remarks on newspaper websites, but it's nice to know I can pull some sort of 
coherent sentence together when I'm eating me porridge.
 

 

 As there has been an alarming rise in mental health problems in recent years 
I've wondered if a combination of meditation and mainstream techniques of 
psychotherapy could be a helpful marriage. For the TMO to investigate different 
combinations of TM and assorted therapies could be a fruitful area of research. 
 

 I'm sure it would. One of the things TM does that is of benefit is that it 
kind of resets the mind when you first learn. We all get used to thinking in 
our normal ways and TM throws the brain into a previously unknowable state, 
it's a good way of realising there are other ways to be. Hallucinogenics do the 
same thing but more reliably, I think TM has different initial effects but I've 
no idea if it could be predictable for different personality types. Everything 
seems to be the cure for everything these days.
 

 

 I suspect that at least one contribution to modern neurosis is that people 
feel guilty that they are not happy! In the West we've created stable, peaceful 
and affluent societies and are subject to a constant stream of ads telling us 
how this or that consumer good will bring us fulfilment. But anxiety and 
depression are endemic as there's always something missing. One thing that TM 
hopefully does is develop that sense that right here and right now you lack 
nothing essential. That has to help inculcate an ability to live at peace in 
each moment as it arises which, other things being equal, should have a 
spiritually beneficial effect.

 

 I remember that as one of the main attractions, an immunity to what life 
throws at you because of strengthening the inner self. Has it worked for me? 
It's an interesting question, I was always an anti-establishment type and 
didn't live the consumer lifestyle so I can't say if I'm happier or not because 
of that. I'd like to have done a 'before and after' personality test and then 
another every five or ten years of meditating to see how I'd changed. Too late 
for any sort of reliable self-reporting I think. 
 

 It would be hard to select from long term meditators a group that hadn't also 
been exposed to the non-materialistic spiritual belief system and, as I 
outlined above, weren't just kidding themselves anyway. Lawson posted a link to 
some research that studied long term TMers and they were self-reporting all 
sorts of wonderful inner evolutionary developments in how they relate to 
themselves and the world. Inspiring stuff but made me wonder where mine was 
after 20 years? As all the respondents were from Fairfield, maybe they'd 
inadvertently proved the Marshy Effect. Or maybe they'd been swept up with the 
mythos and were incapable of interpreting their lives in any other way? I 
wonder how much my scepticism would help in research like that.
 

 And it won't do any harm to tackle the social insecurities and inequalities 
that also plague our existence. Even a dismal subject like politics has a role 
to play.
   
 Is there a cure for the modern world? It's changing so fast, I feel like I'm 
on a carousel sometimes but I'm standing in the middle with it all swinging 
round me so that's a good sign. Sometimes it drags me in and I can't cope any 
better than I used to, which isn't a good sign!
  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :

 At least they are addressing the issue.
 

 Not really addressing it though, this reads more like that article on 
Scientology that Turq posted a few days ago. In particular the chapter on how 
they cover up the homophobia that was a major part of Hubbard's teaching and is 
apparently caused by subconscious "stress" that could be relieved by 
Scientology auditing.
 

 They cope with that intellectual and therapeutic error nowadays by denying 
that Hubbard ever said it, and they have the tapes to prove it - not that 
you'll ever hear them - but it's all in the books in black and white.
 

 In the same way, TM being the cure for all psychiatric problems is a major 
part of Marshy's teaching and forms a chapter of its own in his main book "The 
Science of Being and Art of Living". Seeing a counsellor was actively 
discouraged and the techniques they employ were rubbished as being "shallow" 
compared to TM which deals with problems from the infinitely powerful level of 
the unified field.
 

 But it's good the TMO is climbing down from that demonstrable absurdity, 
sooner or later everyone knows someone with mental health problems or has them 
themselves, what they were telling us clearly wasn't true. But the trouble for 
them in future is that once you start questioning hallowed teaching you can't 
just stop with one example. Sooner or later someone is going to put other 
aspects of the teaching under the microscope, this will be seen as a "bad 
thing" at first and will face the usual denial and counter activism, until the 
evidence becomes too well known for them to hide behind the "knowledge" any 
longer and more caveats and contradictory clarifications will be published.
 

 But it isn't a bad thing as it's how knowledge - genuine knowledge and not 
religious dogma - progresses. Someone has an idea and it gets tested for 
accuracy and is either accepted or rejected or modified depending on how well 
it stands up to scrutiny. Nothing to be scared of but it will be interesting to 
watch how the TMO adapts to a reformation, especially one caused by the 
scientific processes they were hoping would ultimately justify their beliefs as 
revealed to them by Marshy.
 

 Which sacred cow will be next?
 

 

 This is straight off the MUM web page for faculty.
 

 What does it mean when someone practicing the TM technique develops a mental 
illness or commits suicide? 
 It does not mean the technique does not work. The TM program is neither an 
instant nor a stand-alone cure for all the illnesses people may suffer, nor is 
it represented as such.  
 People may be born with certain conditions, stresses, and susceptibilities 
that emerge at various stages in their lives. As published research has 
indicated, the TM technique triggers a global repair mechanism in the 
physiology and psychology of everyone — but it cannot be predicted how, when, 
or to what degree the benefits of the TM program will unfold for a particular 
individual.

 









 












 


 















 












 


 












Reply via email to