---In [email protected], <noozguru@...> wrote :

 On 05/20/2015 01:46 PM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   From: "anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife]" mailto:anartaxius@...[FairfieldLife] 
<[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]
 

 





 I was having lunch with some relatives in Rhode Island a few years ago and the 
topic of the World Trade Towers coming down came up. One said it was an inside 
job. The other, who worked for a large insurance firm that insures buildings 
like that (and had 250 adjusters working under her) they knew pretty well how 
those buildings would fare if hit by aircraft and there was no doubt in their 
minds that the plane took them down.

 
 
 I know a few high iron architect/engineers, the kind who build skyscrapers, 
and none of them ever had any problem with the WTC buildings being brought down 
by the planes. 
 



























 
 Except that after the planes hit you can see people on adjacent floors looking 
out of the building wreckage.  The original architect designed the building to 
take such crashes.  

The buildings did take the impact. It was the intense heat from the ignited jet 
fuel that weakened the structures. The medical examiner who was responsible for 
identifying bodies got some flack for suggesting to the bereaved that some 
would never be identified because they were vaporised from the intense heat. 
The buildings would probably be still standing today if the planes' fuel tanks 
were empty upon impact. Most of the people in those buildings were still alive 
after the impact.
 

 'The structural integrity of the World Trade Center depends on the closely 
spaced columns around the perimeter.  Lightweight steel trusses span between 
the central elevator core and the perimeter columns on each floor.  These 
trusses support the concrete slab of each floor and tie the perimeter columns 
to the core, preventing the columns from buckling outwards.'
 

 'After the initial plane impacts, it appeared to most observers that the 
structure had been severely damaged, but not necessarily fatally.'
 

 'It appears likely that the impact of the plane crash destroyed a significant 
number of perimeter columns on several floors of the building, severely 
weakening the entire system.  Initially this was not enough to cause collapse.'
 

 'However, as fire raged in the upper floors, the heat would have been 
gradually affecting the behavior of the remaining material.  As the planes had 
only recently taken off, the fire would have been initially fuelled by large 
volumes of jet fuel, creating potentially enormously high temperatures. The 
strength of the steel drops markedly with prolonged exposure to fire, while the 
elastic modulus of the steel reduces (stiffness drops), increasing deflections.'
 

 'Modern structures are designed to resist fire for a specific length of time.  
Safety features such as fire retarding materials and sprinkler systems help to 
contain fires, help extinguish flames, or prevent steel from being exposed to 
excessively high temperatures.  This gives occupants time to escape and allow 
fire fighters to extinguish blazes, before the building is catastrophically 
damaged.'
 

 'It is possible that the blaze, started by jet fuel and then engulfing the 
contents of the offices, in a highly confined area, generated fire conditions 
significantly more severe than those anticipated in a typical office fire.  
These conditions may have overcome the building's fire defenses considerably 
faster than expected.'
 

 'Eventually, the loss of strength and stiffness of the materials resulting 
from the fire, combined with the initial impact damage, would have caused a  
failure of the truss system supporting a floor, or the remaining perimeter 
columns, or even the internal core, or some combination.  Failure of the 
flooring system would have subsequently allowed the perimeter columns to buckle 
outwards.  Regardless of which of these possibilities actually occurred, it 
would have resulted in the complete collapse of at least one complete story at 
the level of impact.'
 

 'Once one story collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall.  The huge 
mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing the structurally intact 
floors below, resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure.'

 
 






























Reply via email to