I'm sure Stanford invite a number of speakers folks here won't agree
with. Not only that there was about 20 years ago a MAPI store in Palo Alto.
UC Berkeley recently had Rand Paul as a speaker and he was well received
much to the surprise of the Bay Area community.
On 05/27/2015 12:13 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Salyavin,
You should see the video first before shooting from the hip in
criticizing what Nader had to say.
I posted a news clip yesterday which shows the current thinking in
physics about the source of the universe. The article states that
information is the basis of the cosmos. IMO, this idea ties in with
the concept of consciousness and the unified field, as MMY explained
in the past.
The article further states that scientists are trying to understand if
this information can be analyzed in discreet quanta. IOW, the
scientists are trying to understand the attributes and quality of this
information as the source of the universe.
But the questions that they are posing have already been addressed by
MMY in his discussion of samhita of the rishi-devata-chandas. You
should watch the video for Nader's explanation of the three in one
dynamics of Consciousness or the unified field. This same dynamics
caused the Big Bang and, for that matter, the creation of the infinite
multiverse.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :
Why is - presumably - someone from Stanford University introducing a
mystical speaker with the legend "We've seen how nature is structured
in layers with a unified field at the base". No we haven't, if there
is one thing we know for sure is that we haven't found any unified
fields let alone unified fields of consciousness. The term has no
meaning anyway and where is the field generated from? Does it violate
the laws of conservation of energy? Why isn't it detectable like all
other fields are?
All we get from Tony Nader (what no 'raja raam' today?) is a list of
qualities that consciousness has that he thinks are somehow indicative
of an eternal nature but none of them are!
And the whole point of quantum physics is that it proves the universe
isn't holistic but made up of tiny discrete units called quanta.
That's what the word means not that all things are one or part of a
field, the unified field of physics would have been like all fields
and simply a mathematical way of working out where particles are most
likely to be. They aren't real. And the best candidate for a unified
field turned out to be wrong, it was falsified so why do they keep
going on about it? Simple, because it's their only way of convincing
people that there is some sort of scientific basis to their beliefs.
They decided that the "vedic" way of looking at things had a parallel
before the parallel was found and they didn't change it when they
realised they were wrong. It's the very essence of bad science and
they rely on you not knowing anything about it either.
So why are Stanford University holding introductory talks into
Marshy's vedic "science"? Can we assume it's part of a comparative
religious studies forum?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :
Here's an interesting lecture Dr. Tony Nader delivered at Stanford
University. He explained what happened before the Big Bang and why it
occurred.
Dr. Tony Nader - Hacking Consciousness at Stanford University, Part 2
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqLs2knMngE>
image <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqLs2knMngE>
Dr. Tony Nader - Hacking Consciousness at Stanford...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqLs2knMngE>
Dr. Tony Nader, MD, PhD (MIT, Harvard) reviews scientifically hard and
easy problems surrounding consciousness in biology and cognitive
science. He prop...
View on www.youtube.com <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqLs2knMngE>
Preview by Yahoo
