On 05/27/2015 12:52 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :
I have a friend who is a psychology professor who likes Nader's
ideas. I think Nader is mapping traditional planetary influences to
known areas of the brain that supposedly control those influences. Of
course the jury is out on astrology because scientists are terrified
that if it is thoroughly research it may well have some value. I
wouldn't worry much about opinions here though. I often sit with
people who think astrology is bunk and with people (with science
backgrounds) who think it has some merit. Line on water.
Um, why would a scientist be terrified that astrology has some merit?
Because they fear being discredited.
I think there have been many thorough tests into it and they obviously
drew a blank or it would be part of the mainstream. That's how it works.
"I think" doesn't cut it. There haven't been thorough tests. For one
thing you have to know astrology to put together a proper test. Most
researchers don't know astrology or enough about it to do a proper
test. Then there needs to be funding.
The main thing that's really stupid about King Tony's ideas about
astrology and the brain is that he only uses the planets visible to
the naked eye. If you get a bit objective about it you'll realise
that's as good a disproof as you'll need to treat the rest of it with
immense suspicion. If the guys research standards are so low.....
For one thing the planets visible to the naked eye have centuries of
observation. The outer planets don't and may not have that much
influence. Some of these were discovered when perturbations in Saturn's
orbit were noted that couldn't be attributed just to Jupiter.
Western astrologers speculate up what they think Uranus, Neptune and
Pluto do. We live in a sea orchestrated by planetary influences which
we humans are subservient to even if they are subtle and not readily
apparent. They are more like weather changes.
On 05/27/2015 11:39 AM, jr_esq@... <mailto:jr_esq@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
MJ,
We're more interested in what you personally think of Nader's ideas.
If you disagree, specifically state why.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <mjackson74@...>
<mailto:mjackson74@...> wrote :
The very best part about this video are the comments - everyone,
please read them!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]"
<mailto:jr_esq@...[FairfieldLife]> <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 27, 2015 1:31 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Hacking Consciousness at Stanford
Here's an interesting lecture Dr. Tony Nader delivered at Stanford
University. He explained what happened before the Big Bang and why
it occurred.
Dr. Tony Nader - Hacking Consciousness at Stanford University, Part 2
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqLs2knMngE>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqLs2knMngE>
Dr. Tony Nader - Hacking Consciousness at Stanford...
Dr. Tony Nader, MD, PhD (MIT, Harvard) reviews scientifically hard
and easy problems surrounding consciousness in biology and cognitive
science. He prop...
! View on www.youtube.com <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqLs2knMngE>
Preview by Yahoo
