Sure. Your accusation today that it was dishonest of me to post the last 
paragraph of Barry's post in which he declares he's going to ignore Doug 
completely. That was harassment, for the reasons I've already stated. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote :

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 

I do not say this. But sometimes it's obvious what state of mind a poster is 
in. 

 salyavin was just demanding that Ann quit what he called her "dumb harassment 
of Xeno." How about you quit your dumb harassment of me and other TM supporters?
 

 Or is the idea to make up for Barry's absence by emulating his harassing 
behavior? You, salyavin, and Curtis seem to be working pretty hard at it, if 
not very coherently.

Me: You are making a false accusation Judy. Or perhaps you would like to post a 
single example of me emulating "harassing behavior?" 



 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <anartaxius@...> wrote :

 Ah. The master projector oracle speaks. I know, she says, exactly what 
everyone is really thinking and why.

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:00 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Time to come clean Doug
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <steve.sundur@...> wrote :

 I would certainly have to agree with you, xeno. 

 The question is how, or why do you respond to someone who, for a great 
majority of the time, is just going for a reaction.
 

 It is a total waste of time, for which I am guilty.
 

 I agree that Barry was likely never upset when he posted.
 

 

 I beg to differ with both of you. He was often incoherent with rage and 
completely out of control when he posted after someone had dissected one of his 
posts. You could count on it: he would very rarely respond directly to 
criticism, but a day or so later, he'd come out with one of his long posts 
attacking the critic on whatever grounds he could dream up.
 

 All his bluster about folks being attached to the self was projection; he was 
as attached as anybody and much more attached than some.
 




 


 













Reply via email to