Farouk

Hi, I'm a governor from the UK and via a roundabout route I got your
open letter to Michael Dilbeck. I thought I'd send you a quote from
another email which I got from Michael Moore.

<<< begins>>>
Friends, 

I just thought we should all pause for a moment today to remember the
simple act of courage, defiance and dignity committed by Rosa Parks when
she refused to move to the back of the bus because the law said she had
the wrong skin color. The greatest moments in history, the ones that
have truly mattered and have taken us to a better place, are made up of
scores of these singular acts by ordinary, everyday people who could no
longer tolerate the crap and the nonsense of those in charge. 

Today, whether it is a student who holds a sit-in to get the army
recruiters off his campus, or the mother of a dead soldier who refuses
to leave the front gate of the president's ranch, we continue to be
saved by brave people who risk ridicule and rejection but end up turning
huge tides of public opinion in the direction of righteousness. We owe
them enormous debts of gratitude. It is not easy to stand up for what is
right, especially when everyone else is afraid to leave the comfortable
path of conformity.

...
<<<<ends>>>
Highly relevant in the case of the TM movement don't you think? 

My own approach is somewhat different. I applaud those who take a stand
against the crap and the nonsense we all have to endure within the
movement but I have chosen to take a stand against a different type of
crap and the nonsense. I realised some time ago that the supposed
scientific analysis of the relationships between modern science and
Vedic science was in fact pseudo-scientific rubbish. Rather than turn
around and walk away in disgust I resolved to do something about it. So
I put myself through a series of courses in mathematics so that I could
acquire the skills required. My reasoning being that although the
present analysis is total nonsense, if the insights of Vedic science as
proposed by Maharishi are true then it ought to be possible to use those
insights to guide one to solutions to the deepest problems of modern
physics. I've discovered that this inspiration is correct. But in a very
unexpected way, or rather perhaps in a way that should have been
expected for anyone who has had any contact with Maharishi's knowledge.
When cast in mathematical terms the insight that the ultimate reality is
of transcendental nature suggests that there can be no finite Unified
Field Theory. Also the insight that this transcendental reality can be
experienced as if it were a sequence of experiences happening one after
the other, as expressed in the Apurusheya Bhashya, has very interesting
mathematical consequences. Taking this point of view, then some of the
deepest problems of modern physics such as the dimensionality of space
and the origin of the symmetries of the Standard Model have wonderfully
elegant solutions. I recently presented a paper outlining these ideas at
a conference in Europe, (where I took prize for best lecture), and this
initial paper will be published next year. Though it's nice to get some
appreciation from experts who are utterly disdainful of John Hagelin,
much remains to be done. So it will be some time yet before a complete
analysis will be possible. 

The interesting thing is that one can use use Maharishi's knowledge to
solve these problems and hence give the knowledge true scientific
credibility while at the same time demolishing just about everything
John Hagelin has done. One wonders at the intellectual ineptitude that
has allowed his ideas to gain credence within the movement. The more I
study this field the more I find that his ideas are packed solid with
errors of reasoning and elementary maths.  I know of many intelligent
people within the movement who have their doubts about John Hagelin's
ideas and even more doubts about Tony Nader's ideas but fail to speak
out for fear of punishment. However I do not think that he and people
like him are in any way inherently bad people, it's just that the
organisational structure of the movement discourages intelligent
thought. It is the culture of fear within the movement that is inimical
to genuine scientific enquiry and ultimately that culture of fear has
its basis in Maharishi himself. 

I think that as the movement contracts and becomes ever more ludicrous
more and more intelligent sincere people are going to find their voices.
People are thinking to themselves "I've kept my gob shut for fear of
being chucked out of the movement, but if things carry on as they are
then there isn't going to be a movement left to be chucked out of".
Little things like your action have big consequences in such an
environment. Ultimately, if we are going to create Sat Yuga, then the
movement has to be reformed. Arrogance, spitefulness, pseudo-science and
pantomime kings have to be removed. Absurd prices and absurd
restrictions on teaching will have to go. We have been waiting for an
awakening in public consciousness, but the public has always been
willing to take to this knowledge when properly presented. The awakening
will be our realisation that all obstructions are self-created and can
be removed in an instant. This will be the true phase transition.

Jai Guru Dev
   
John Small

Farrokh & Ruffina Anklesaria
The Enlightened Sentencing Project (TESP)
Administrative Office
202 Tiffin Ave
Ferguson, MO 63135
Visit our website at www.tesp.org
Tel: 314 521 4390





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to