Of course I meant "*It* worked for centuries without capitalism."
On 01/18/2016 07:51 PM, emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Listen up Mike, he's got "centuries" of experience! He knows his work
history back through his past lives. (That could make a helluva resume.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :
I think you mean "free enterprise" not capitalism. It doesn't take
big money to do that. I worked for centuries without capitalism.
On 01/18/2016 06:12 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@...
<mailto:mdixon.6569@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
It all works together! Businesses arent 'going to have anything to
sell to the middle class or anyone, if they can't barrow to stock
their stores with goods.It's called C-A-P-I-T-A-I-S-M.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... <mailto:noozguru@...>
[FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 6:19 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Is this right?
What about the middle class? If they have income they spend it
too and there are magnitudes more of them than the rich. Your
argument is a straw man.
On 01/18/2016 02:36 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@...
<mailto:mdixon.6569@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Dude! those are examples. Rich people don't go out and bury their
wealth. They buy things and/or put it to work. If they put it in
a bank, the bank uses it to loan to people, companies, cities,
states and nations who in turn pays people with it for services,
products and pensions. The money works! The rich manage it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... <mailto:noozguru@...>
[FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 3:33 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Is this right?
ROTFL! Mike, you DO realize building products like that don't put
a lot of people to work? Much if it is custom built with small
crews. Stop celebrating the rich screwing you over. I guess you
think it feels good?
A middle class with the ability to spend would way outweigh the
rich ability to put people to work.
On 01/18/2016 01:00 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@...
<mailto:mdixon.6569@...> [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Somebody builds those yachts, mansions, Cadillacs, etc.Somebody
maintains them, Somebody sells them, Somebody transports them.
Somebody buys them and pays taxes on them. Somebody hires
financial planners and lawyers to work for them. I would say the
rich put a lot of people to work, one way or another.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "Bhairitu noozguru@... <mailto:noozguru@...>
[FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
*Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2016 11:26 AM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Is this right?
Doyou think this is fair or right? Billionairism is mental disease
called greed. And don't tell me they're the jobs creators. It's
small
businesses that are the jobs creators. The big companies buy up the
small ones and lay people off. Acquisitions are a bad business fad.
Corporations should be limited in size and lifespan. And taxes
should
increase of the wealthy to discourage wealth accumulation and
contracting billionairism.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/global-wealth-inequality_56991defe4b0ce4964242e09
