Again, the investigations are not complete and as such the evidence
has not been released to the public.
Here are some possibilities in the event that "collusion" is proven.
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/may/31/gregg-jarrett/fox-news-hosts-wrong-no-law-forbids-russia-trump-c/
---In [email protected], <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
So tell us what they have uncovered. What laws were broken and what is
the evidence that involves Trump or his campaign?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Saturday, June 10, 2017 12:54 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump
Again, not possible that you would know ahead of the conclusion of the
investigation(s) in progress. (The operative phrase here is *in
progress.*) Are you really trying to tell me that you are basing your
conclusions on what the couple of people that have provided public
testimony have said so far? Seriously? You are livin' in a
dreamworld.....
These investigations, however, can be broken down into three categories:
* First, the intertwined Justice Department investigation, now led
by a special counsel, into the ties between the Trump campaign and
Russia and, reportedly, the possible cover-up.
* Second, the investigations led by the House and Senate
Intelligence Committees, which are broadly looking at Russian
intervention in the 2016 election.
* Third, the Senate Judiciary Committee and House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee have been looking into former National
Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s conduct specifically — and have
recently expanded their inquiry to the circumstances surrounding
former FBI Director James Comey’s firing.
---In [email protected], <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
When I say *everyone* , I'm referring to the heads of the various
agencies that have been leading the investigations and are in a
position to know, that have testified. Clapper , Comey and a few
others last week all said there is no evidence of Collusion or
Obstruction by Trump and that he was *not* a target of their
investigations.. Now of course CNN et al will find some anonymous
source or sources that can't be questioned to say otherwise.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Friday, June 9, 2017 11:39 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump
Again, not the case. "Everyone that has been involved" has not said
any such thing. You do not know who all has been involved, because
the investigations have not concluded. Have we heard from Bob Mueller
yet, for example? Have we heard from the different congressional
investigations that are *ongoing*?
It seems that your information sources are divorced from reality and
reflecting a one-sided illusion that you have bought into and are
parroting here.
I did not say at any time that I was certain there is a crime or that
there isn't a crime that has been committed. What I said was that
"more will be revealed" and that we do not know what the pattern of
evidence will show, yet. I am not a lawyer and neither are you.
Yes, we will see......
---In [email protected], <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
I do know that everyone that has been involved has said there is no
evidence of tampering or collusion. If you are so certain that there
was a crime, what was the crime and what is the evidence? We've all
been waiting to see or hear.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Friday, June 9, 2017 9:37 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump
Again, you are coming to summary conclusions before the investigations
have completed. You have no idea what the pattern of evidence will
show in the end or what all the evidence is. You are just caught up
in the grind of watching the daily "soap opera."
---In [email protected], <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
Comey never said Trump committed *obstruction of justice*. There is no
evidence of obstruction, or collusion with the Russians as stated by
Clapper, Comey and others that were interrogated by congress just last
week. Zero, Zip, Nada!
When Trump told Comey that he *hoped* he would let Flynn off or go,
Comey took it as an instruction. That is his personal view which is
purely subjective. The English language dictates that is a hope for an
outcome. Not illegal or a dictate.
If John is referring to Al Green as the congressman righting up
articles of impeachment, the man is a fool like Maxine Waters and
Sheila Jackson Lee. He doesn't even know what the charges would be.I
would be surprised if the majority of his constituents graduated high
school.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Friday, June 9, 2017 12:56 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump
John, are you saying that in the public testimony "Comey just said
that Trump committed obstruction of justice and a federal crime.?"
You must not be talking literally. I'm pretty gosh darn positive he
didn't say either such thing. However, I feel your pain.
Here's a good article on impeachment. Impeachment does not mean
removal. The likelihood that Trump will be removed through the
impeachment process is slim to none, imho.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/12/15615066/impeachment-trump-process-history
---In [email protected], <jr_esq@...> wrote :
Emily,
Comey has stated so in the article shown. I'm sure he knows how to
present his evidence to support his point. Also, he has an ax to
grind since he was fired by Trump. For the senators in the committee,
it will be hard for them ignore the details of his testimony. All of
these things are recorded and filmed which is available to all
investigative reporters and all politicians.
There's already a Democratic congressman who has crafted the steps
needed to impeach Trump. It's only a matter of time when the snowball
effect will take over the political climate in DC. And, it looks grim
for Trump.
---In [email protected], <emily.mae50@...> wrote :
jr, Comey didn't say either of those things, I don't believe. We are
a long ways from impeachment.
There is no final conclusion yet on whether obstruction or collusion
occurred. Trump has most definitely not been "virtually cleared of any
wrong doing." Multiple investigations are still ongoing, yes? More
will be revealed.
---In [email protected], <jr_esq@...> wrote :
MD,
Comey just said that Trump committed obstruction of justice and a
federal crime which are punishable by impeachment. His testimony as
an ex-FBI chief cannot be brushed aside easily by the Senators in the
committee. This could become another Watergate for those who are
looking for significance and historical comparison.
---In [email protected], <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :
John
I'm sure you couldn't see how he was elected either.
Trump has been virtually cleared of any wrong doing.
He was never under investigation and there is no evidence of any
collusion with the *Russians* and no evidence of obstruction of justice.
I know this has got to be pissing the media and democrats off but
these are the facts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Thursday, June 8, 2017 12:23 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] The Dismantling of Trump
Comey's testimony today has caused a flurry of questions against
Trump's personal and management style. He appears to be playing the
"ratings" game to keep his job as president. I don't see any positive
angle for Trump to save his job/gig at the White House.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/live-coverage-james-comey-senate-testimony-153308399.html
