I felt this an interesting response inside this thread below. I find that different X-ians evidently have a developed technical jargon that while it is their own seems to match up with other’s mysticism in other spiritual lines, in language meaningful to something experienced as universal Providence whether by language of X-ian, Buddhistic, Vedic, a Science of Creative Intelligence or mystical experience of physics.
The minister in the video seems to be talking also to a more narrow way about different ‘tongues’, not as brain schizophrenic but about meditation in thinking or reciting with words of spiritual matter. Like different ‘tongues’ of scripture, japa, mantras, if even in unknown language. Sort of like TM;’ers have learned to sound out sanskrit without knowing its meaning as a cultivating spiritual practice. So yes this Christian’s experience with the Unified Field through ™ and the Christ in a x-ian practice is likely universal and can be cross cultural. An Offered observation: As a Christian, who has recently become a meditator, I find this very helpful. I have experienced 'speaking in tongues' and when I had my first day of TM instruction, during the "puja" I heard words that were familiar to me in my charismatic experience. I am wondering lately if the unified field isn't just God in His purity. I will always love my Jesus ( because seriously, who doesn't want a hot 30 year old man who will die for you and make all things right to be your friend!) but my TM time is equally as satisfying, especially as I 'ponder' God's goodness. So, each day, I can say "Praise God, Hallelujah" and 'Jai Guru Dev' at the same time. Thanks, Libby from Oklahoma ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : Carde, MMY was saying that you don't have to understand sanskrit to reap the benefits of reading its ancient texts. The sounds of the works by Jaimini and others are enough to give benefits to the reader. In Pantanjali's case one can levitate or disappear from one's environment. ---In [email protected], <hepa7@...> wrote : The main problem here might well be that if you have next to no idea what the text is about and of the individual grammatical and semantic elements, or stuff, your brains are very prone to misinterpret the input from your ears: http://kissthisguy.com/ http://kissthisguy.com/
