--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> on 2/4/06 2:17 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> 
> >> I agree. The enlightened man driving his car makes the decisions
> > necessary
> >> to navigate successfully through traffic and arrive at his
> > destination. Why
> >> shouldn't other decisions be just as volitional and just as 
> > to dire
> >> consequences if they are made capriciously?
> >> 
> > 
> > What capriociously? Why would someone's decision-making process be
> > capricious if enlightened (and hence not owning the process since 
> > is a guna-based thing) but not capricious prior to enlightenment?
> Maybe "spontaneous" would be a better word than "capricious." I've 
> both Maharishi and local enlightened friends say that they're often
> surprised by the things they find themselves doing. Maharishi would 
say "I
> was saying such and such in that lecture. There must have been 
someone who
> needed to hear it." Another friend said, "I was going to the post 
office but
> found myself at the coffee shop," implying that something other 
than an
> individuality was in the driver's seat.

That's true regardless of enlightenment or not. We are creatures of 
habit and unexplained behavior. Surely you've noticed this in 
yourself? And MMY's assumptiona bout someone needing to hear what he 
had to say sounds like his OWN interpretation of his own unexplained 
behavior. THat's not to say he wasn't correct, only that MMY had no 
more clue about the explaination for the unexplained than anyone else 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to