--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <no_reply@> > wrote: > > Given that the molecular purification was "intense" it must be > > quantitively significant -- the change in toxin levels must be > clearly > > measurable. Have you surveyed any of the literature to see what > toxins > > dramatically decrease with siddhis practice? Do such findings > > correlate with your post siddhis experience (that is, if the > research > > indicated removal of toxins related to a specific cellular > > /physiologic process, did you notice higher level purification in > that > > area? > > > > Perhaps the intense molecular changes and removal of toxins are not > > universal from siddhis practice, per Meridith post. Have you > > volunteered for exploratory studies physiological studies to > pinpoint > > the intense molecular changes and toxin removal in your > physiology? If > > you are experience intese molecular change and toxin removal from a > > mental practice, it would be a milestone in medicine and biology to > > pinpoint these changes in your body chemistry. This would be > > increadibly important to the advancement of science. If you have > not > > beat down the doors of Stanford of UC Berkeley to be tested, it > seems > > selfish given the contribution to the world such findings would > bring. > > > You are on a rant. decaf please
No rant. Just following things to a logical conclusion. If you are experiencing intense molecular change and toxin removal from a mental practice, it would be a milestone in medicine and biology to pinpoint these changes in your body chemistry. Do you truly disagree? That you are not having these processes tested and allowing science to examine and explore them is terribly self-centered and selfish. Do you really disagree with that? You use time honored methods to try to avoid scrutiny of your claims by deflection, name calling and making the questioner the issue. Perhaps you have found such tactics effective previously and have made them a habit. Regardless, you are responding in a very odd way for someone who is making an extraordinary claim and experiencing a medical / physiological breakthrough. My best hypothesis at this point as to why you would act thusly is that your claims are some kind of odd hoax. Otherwise you would be open, if not eager for quesions,validation and making a major contribution to world health. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
