|
On Feb 15, 2006, at 9:07 AM, authfriend wrote:
It appears to be old. Having said that apologists will use whatever means they can--esp. when these are followers who are proceeding with a real religious zeal--this would not necessarily be official TMO feeds (most likely NOT official), just ambiguity and revision. You see a similar thing in Neocon politics where rather than revealing the truth about global warming, you create ambiguities so people can believe there is no real scientific consensus--"we need more research". Of course this will be a non sequitur for you. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "angels on earth" Vaj
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "angels on earth" authfriend
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "angels on earth&quo... bbrigante
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "angels on earth&quo... bbrigante
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "angels on earth... sparaig
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "angels on e... bbrigante
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "an... Rick Archer
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles "an... bbrigante
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles ... Rick Archer
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles &quo... bbrigante
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Beatles ... Rick Archer
