--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 2006, at 4:10 PM, cardemaister wrote: > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Feb 20, 2006, at 2:58 PM, wmurphy77 wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Where in TM parlance do the higher levels of consciousness > MMY > > talks > > > >>> about, i.e. TC, CC, GC and UC correspond to the spiritual > > centers in > > > >>> the spine? And, has MMY ever talked about the all seeing > > > > spiritual > > > >>> eye > > > >>> aka. the astral 'third eye', portal to the infinite (and > > > >>> transcendent)? BillyG. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> There were pranayamas given in Seelisburg that related to the > > third > > > >> eye. The TM puja refers to the opening of the ajna. > > > > > > > > It seems to me the second last (KS) Shiva-suutra is about > saMyama > > > > on the aajñaa[=command?]-cakra (from memory: naasikaantar- > madhya- > > > > saMyamaat kim atra savyaapasavya-sauSamneSu). Perhaps that means > > > > that kuNDalinii-yoga -practises are needless when one does > saMyama > > > > on "naasika_antar-madhya". > > > > > > > > > It's talking about maintaining awareness regardless of what > > channel > > > prana is flowing in. > > > > Thanks Vaj...it seems to me most tmers are a little 'mum' on the > > subject as MMY has never, to my knowledge, even mentioned it (at > > least in any detail). To think that the pathway of transcending is > > thru the sushumna in the astral spine to the crown chakra, via the > > astral third eye, and that is hardly mentioned is a bit odd > wouldn't > > you think? Transcending to the absolute and not going thru the > astral > > third eye...doubtful! BillyG. > > > > P.S. Not that Tm wouldn't eventually accomplish this, but, my guess > > is the number of people that have actually transcended to savikalpa > > samadhi in TM is about a half a dozen. :-) > > > > You're certain that 1) the texts you are citing are correct; > 2) that your interpretation of said texts is correct; > 3) that even if they are, that your interpretation of what TM does or > does not do is correct.
I don't even know if my shoes fit properly, give me a break! Well, you know the old saying, "the proof is in the pudding". ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
