--- In [email protected], "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah, there you are quite wrong. I do not believe homosexual anal intercourse > should be made illegal, and certainly should not result in sentences of two > years hard labor, as it did in the case of Oscar Wilde. Nor do I think that > homosexuals should be discriminated against. What people do in the privacy > of their own homes is their own business. But it doesn't mean I have to go > along with the homosexual agenda that brainwashes people into believing > that a homosexual 'lifestyle" is just as good as any other. No doubt the > sodomites on this board who have so recently been giving out handy little tips > on their practices will disagree, as is their right. Everyone has the right to > choose their own path to hell.
I think you're trying to have your cake and eat it, too, feste37. On the one hand, you are now saying that "homosexual anal intercourse" should be illegal (as opposed to heterosexual anal intercourse?), that homosexuals shouldn't be discriminated against, and that it is their own business what people do in the privacy of their own homes...but on the other hand... you say that the advice that certain "Sodomites" on this forum (whose titillating little gems of discussion were nowhere near as far-reaching as the Oscar Wilde shit-staining anecdotes) may very well be choosing their own "path to hell". There is a disconnect here: either you believe homosexuality to be something wrong or you don't...but don't try to have it both ways. That is: you seem to want to show you are tolerant on the one hand but that this tolerance doesn't extend to tolerating that such people have a snowball's chance in hell of getting to heaven on the other... I think you would have been on much safer ground to have retorted to Judy that you weren't a homophobe just because you think that a certain act is disgusting. After all, homosexual acts don't have exclusivity on disgustingness and you could have easily have pointed that out to her because, after all, that is apparently what she was basing her accusation of homophobia on. I think it should also be pointd out that your moniker -- "feste" -- is a wee bit too close to the word "gay". > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > I read everything. Oscar Wilde is one of my favorite authors. One > > of my > > > favorite characters in all literature is Lord Henry Wootton, in > > Picture of Dorian > > > Gray. Lord Henry is a homosexual, but he has some lovely epigrams. > > What > > > happened to Oscar was a terrible tragedy. > > > > You bet it was. You do realize that it was homophobes > > like you who created the tragedy, don't you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but I don't find the acts disgusting. I > > > > > find homophobia such as yours disgusting. > > > > > > > > What were you doing reading that book, by the way? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by > > > > > endorsing the > > > > > > practice of buggery might care to consult The Secret Life of > > > > Oscar > > > > > Wilde > > > > > > (2005), by Neil McKenna, which provides many details of the > > > > > disgusting > > > > > > nature of such acts. After Oscar had his way with the young > > men > > > > who > > > > > came to > > > > > > his hotel room, the sheets were stained with shit, and this > > was > > > > > important > > > > > > evidence, as supplied by a maid, in Oscar's conviction at his > > > > > trial. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], foufou_fl <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > > <jstein@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], foufou_fl > > <no_reply@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" > > > > > > > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" > > > > <feste37@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, Jude, I hate to be the first person to inform > > you > > > > of > > > > > this, > > > > > > > > > > > but the particular orifice in question was not > > designed > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > accommodate that particular appendage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're going to appeal to teleology, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was shocked tofind that feste is a creationist -- or > > at > > > > > least an > > > > > > > > > intelligent design deist pseudo scientist. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or maybe just a homophobe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought the latter was synonomous with the former two. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
