On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:48 PM, authfriend wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <no_reply@> wrote:


That's it. That was also Papaji's point stating too many 
are hanging around already too long.


Yes, many would rather wallow in the inertia of their 'seeker' 
identity, proclaiming enlightenment can't be so, because of 
this, and that, and the other thing...


Gotta agree. And it ain't just here...it's a fairly
universal trend in spiritual groups. Those who say
that they have experienced the goal that is shared
by pretty much the entire group (for example, 
enlightenment) are regularly dissed by those in
the group who have not had such an experience.
One would think they'd be happy that someone is
actually getting what they paid for, but the 
reality is sadly often the opposite.


In other words, when someone claims to be enlightened,
we should just accept it without question?

Or what if you were familiar with the state people were describing/conveying/satsanging and knew it as "other than" the big E?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to