--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], t3rinity <no_reply@> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Irmeli Mattsson" > > <Irmeli.Mattsson@> wrote: > > > > > Generally I dislike in this post the tone of idealizing one > > > person's work, and the egoistic approach of trying to make > > > his work crucial to human consciousness evolution in this time. > > > > You *dislike* it right? It's just judgement, that's okay. But > > I can tell you why: Michael idealizes MMY's work, simply because > > he *loves* MMY. The explantions he gives are logical, but the > > idealization is of his heart. > > Fine so far. > > > That's Bhakti, reverence, in Michaels case for the guru. > > You dislike it, showing me that you don't have Bhakti, cannot > > recognize it when you see it, and have even may feel disgust > > for it. > > Bzzzzzt! Not so fine. > > You're doing it AGAIN, Michael.
Doing it again? Speaking about Bhakti? Is that forbidden on this forum? Sorry nobody told me there is this kind of censure here. > When someone (in this > case Irmeli) doesn't believe the way you believe, you > respond by 1) assuming that it's because of a *lack* > in her, some trait she doesn't have, Wrong, you misinterpret me dear one. I don't respond to Irmelis disagreement *about* MMY, that I take as a given, but about her *dislike* of Michaels *tone*. I interpret it in my way, as a lack of bhakti which I clearly pointed out > and 2) that your > way of seeing things (because of course you have such > a trait) is better. In fact I don't see things the same way as Michael does. I have a different opinion with regard to MMY, but I have an appreciation of his Bhakti. Somebody may have Bhakti for someone I really don't like, but I nevertheless will appreciate the Bhakti he has once I recognize it. It's a matter of anticipation and appreciation of the personal feeling (refined emotional) rather than about opinions (purely mental) > > Poor you! > > No, poor you. > > Someday you should learn that people who see things > differently than you are not lower than you are. Maybe first learn reading what a person actually has said, and don't just dump on him once he appears. Once more: my post is not about the difference of opinions about Maharishi that Michael and Irmeli have, but about her dumping on the devotional attidute per se. That in itself is an intolerance, and it is your intolerance of even disallowing to bring this angle up. Poor you! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
