--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> > We all know from everyday experience that questions 
> > (curiosity) generally can have two very distinct 
> > purposes, even in mundane conversation:
> > 
> > 1. To actually gain understanding, as sincere inquiries; 
> >     to create love/togetherness/unity by going deeper 
> >     into knowledge; to open the conduit for richer 
> >     flow of knowledge.
> > 
> > 2. To hide something behind the smokescreen of a question:
> >     a. To hide our criticism/anger, to avoid making a 
> >        directly critical statement.
> >     b. To hide that we're trying to control or dominate 
> >        someone - to hide that we're trying to manipulate 
> >        someone or trying to engage someone in a game.
> >     c. To create doubt/division/fear.
> 
> His definition of the first (good) type of question 
> seems to be that they have to be based on total and 
> complete surrender and submission to the teacher.

Sorry to correct you Barry: but he nowhere says so. He rather speaks
of questions *curiosity* even in a 'mundane conversation'

This does not imply complete surrender and submission as you falsly say.

> His definition of the second type of question seems 
> to be that their "purpose" is by definition bad or
> nefarious, and that therefore the questions he assigns
> to this category can be justifiably disregarded, and 
> the questioner demonized.

Well, we all know rethoric questions, don't we? (This was a rethoric
question). To me this seems to be just an extension on such rethoric
questions. Maybe rethoric question, which are not immediately
recognizable as such. I don't see any demonization in this.

> Doesn't it strike you as fascinating that a person 
> who has set *himself* up as a for-profit spiritual 
> teacher is *already* promoting a closed belief 
> system in which any question about his *own* actions 
> that he doesn't like can automatically be written 
> off as a) angry, b) an attempt at control or game-
> playing, or c) an attempt to sow seeds of doubt 
> and fear?
> 
> If I were *really* cynical, I would suggest that
> this kind of closed belief system doesn't bode well 
> for Michael's clients.

Well, you are real cynical and say it. Again, rethoric.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to