--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just a couple of points:
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], defenders_of_bhakti 
> > > > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree. Actually, I was just trying to poke some fun on 
> > > > > the 'walking meditation' supposedly more effortless than 
> > > > > TM according to some here.
> > > > 
> > > > The meditation *component* of it is, IMO, more
> > > > effortless than TM, in that there is no specific
> > > > intent -- no mantra, no instruction to focus on 
> > > > anything in particular, nada.
> > > 
> > > There is no specific intent during TM, either (much
> > > less instruction to focus on anything in particular).
> > 
> > Well, there's almost a specific intent inherent in the 
instructions 
> > (else, why call them "instructions?")
> 
> There's a case to be made that they *aren't*
> instructions, actually...
> 
> In any case, I would contend that after a certain
> amount of practice, you aren't doing anything that
> could be called "following instructions."  Vaj calls
> it "conditioning," and that may be an appropriate
> term.  In which case, there's intent only to the
> point where you sit down and close the eyes, then
> the conditioning takes over.
> 

If its really conditioning, than its no longer innocent. While the 
practice of TM brings about changes in the structure of the brain, I 
don't think that it involves conditioning inthe usual sense. At best, 
one becomes confident enough that the practice IS easy to no longer 
feel a need to try to make it happen.

At worse, you assign a value-judgement to one aspect of TM practice 
to another and latch onto it as the "proper" practice.

Of course, im my experience, both extremes happen all the time.


> 
> , but its not something you can 
> > pin down with strict accuracy. Its a hiesenberg uncertainty 
> principle 
> > thang: the more you try to pin it down, the less accurately you 
> > capture the "intent."
> > 
> > >
> >
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to