--- In [email protected], "brahmachari108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], Rick Archer <fairfieldlife@> wrote: > > From a friend: > > Dear Rick > > snip > > but we must remember > > that Maharishi, as a spiritual Master, has a responsibility > > towards the spiritual enlightenement of his disciples. That > > may mean that M instantly dissolves any successful venture > > a disciple sets up if that disciple has any ego involved. > > What Maharishi? Talking only about first verse of Rg Ved for > 30 years makes a maharishi?
It does if you don't know any better. It does if you are so incurious as to have been *satisfied* with that little actual substance in 30 years. The thing that amazes me is not that people consider Maharishi a "master," but that they are satisfied with such a lame definition of what a "master" is. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
